Hi,
In partprobe/partprobe.c it says:
Inform the OS of partition table changes.
-d, --no-update don't update the kernel
To me "updating the kernel" means to install a new version of the
kernel. But it seems that "don't inform the kernel" is the
intended meaning. If so, then a bett
Trying to install parted-.1.8.7 from an overlay produces this:
[...]
Making check in tests
make[1]: Entering directory
`/var/tmp/portage/sys-apps/parted-1.8.7/work/parted-1.8.7/tests'
make check-TESTS
make[2]: Entering directory
`/var/tmp/portage/sys-apps/parted-1.8.7/work/parted-1.8.7/tests'
Benno Schulenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Trying to install parted-.1.8.7 from an overlay produces this:
Thanks for the report.
What is an "overlay"? Please give enough information so that
someone here can try to reproduce your problem.
Also, when a test fails, please rerun it like e.g.,
Hello, gentle maintainer. This is a message from the Translation
Project robot.
A revised PO file, for programs using the textual domain `parted', has
been submitted by the team of translators taking care of the Dutch
language. This particular file, along with all other PO files
pertaining to the
In libparted/labels/fdasd.c and libparted/labels/vtoc.c the
functions that print out error messages put several "%s" and "\n"
in the gettextized strings, unnecessarily Patches that make this
simpler are coming up in a minute.
The patches also gettextize a few messages that were overlooked.
F
And gettextize a few missed messages.
---
include/parted/vtoc.h |1 -
libparted/labels/vtoc.c | 26 +-
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/parted/vtoc.h b/include/parted/vtoc.h
index 3e79478..2e09caa 100644
--- a/include/parted/v
Also gettextize a few more missed messages, and simplify some of them.
---
include/parted/fdasd.h |1 -
libparted/labels/fdasd.c | 88 ++
2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/parted/fdasd.h b/include/parted/fda
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Benno Schulenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Trying to install parted-.1.8.7 from an overlay produces this:
>
> Thanks for the report.
> What is an "overlay"?
Something Gentoo-specific.
> Also, when a test fails, please rerun it like e.g.,
>
> cd tests && ./t1000-basic
Benno Schulenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Benno Schulenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Trying to install parted-.1.8.7 from an overlay produces this:
>>
>> Thanks for the report.
>> What is an "overlay"?
>
> Something Gentoo-specific.
Thanks, but that doesn't help
Benno Schulenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> In partprobe/partprobe.c it says:
>
> Inform the OS of partition table changes.
>
> -d, --no-update don't update the kernel
>
> To me "updating the kernel" means to install a new version of the
> kernel. But it seems that "don't i
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Benno Schulenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * expecting success: $compare out /dev/null
> > --- out 2007-05-16 14:47:00.0 +
> > +++ /dev/null 2005-05-14 16:37:31.0 +
> > @@ -1 +0,0 @@
> > -
> > \ No newline at end of file
> > * FAIL 3: expect no
Here's a somewhat better version of that patch, removing the
superflouus parentheses and some whitespace.
Benno
>From 8dd17aea731da4c064edb4c13c7e02b9b0da3012 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Benno Schulenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 21:52:56 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Move formatti
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Benno Schulenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Better use the same word in both cases then:
> >
> > Inform the operating system about partition table changes.
> >
> > -d, --dry-run do not actually inform the operating system
>
> Ack. Can you provide a patch for i
Benno Schulenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> diff --git a/partprobe/partprobe.c b/partprobe/partprobe.c
> index 1659100..e79193a 100644
> --- a/partprobe/partprobe.c
> +++ b/partprobe/partprobe.c
> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
>
> static struct option const long_options[] =
>{
> -{"no-update", no_a
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Benno Schulenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -{"no-update", no_argument, NULL, 'd'},
> > +{"dry-run", no_argument, NULL, 'd'},
>
> Looks good, but do not remove support for --no-update just yet.
> Instead, mark it as deprecated, and with a comment suggesting
> when
Benno Schulenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Benno Schulenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > -{"no-update", no_argument, NULL, 'd'},
>> > +{"dry-run", no_argument, NULL, 'd'},
>>
>> Looks good, but do not remove support for --no-update just yet.
>> Instead, mark i
Benno Schulenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Benno Schulenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > * expecting success: $compare out /dev/null
>> > --- out 2007-05-16 14:47:00.0 +
>> > +++ /dev/null 2005-05-14 16:37:31.0 +
>> > @@ -1 +0,0 @@
>> > -
>>
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Benno Schulenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > # dd if=/dev/zero of=FILE bs=1M count=1 2>/dev/null
> > # parted -s FILE mklabel msdos >out 2>&1
> > # xxd out
> > 000: 1b5b 3f31 3033 3468 .[?1034h
>
> That's probably coming from one of your startup do
Benno Schulenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Benno Schulenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > # dd if=/dev/zero of=FILE bs=1M count=1 2>/dev/null
>> > # parted -s FILE mklabel msdos >out 2>&1
>> > # xxd out
>> > 000: 1b5b 3f31 3033 3468 .[?1034h
>>
19 matches
Mail list logo