Brian C. Lane writes:
> Given the number of times this has come up it's probably worth looking
> into changing the assertion to something more understandable.
I'd rather actually fix it to support having the EBR be located
somewhere else. I have been meaning to do that for a few years now ;)
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 04:08:26PM +0100, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> On Apr 22 2019, Phillip Susi wrote:
> > Nikolaus Rath writes:
> >
> >> /dev/sdb6 739131392 739588095456704 223M 83 Linux
> >> /dev/sdb7 739588096 773142527 3355443216G 8e Linux LVM
> >
> > sdb7 starts in the ve
On Apr 22 2019, Phillip Susi wrote:
> Nikolaus Rath writes:
>
>> /dev/sdb6 739131392 739588095456704 223M 83 Linux
>> /dev/sdb7 739588096 773142527 3355443216G 8e Linux LVM
>
> sdb7 starts in the very next sector after sdb6, so there is no room here
> for the EBR.
...right,
Nikolaus Rath writes:
> /dev/sdb6 739131392 739588095456704 223M 83 Linux
> /dev/sdb7 739588096 773142527 3355443216G 8e Linux LVM
sdb7 starts in the very next sector after sdb6, so there is no room here
for the EBR.
Here's what regular fdisk says:
# fdisk -l /dev/sdb
Disk /dev/sdb: 465.8 GiB, 500107862016 bytes, 976773168 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0xe
