Otavio Salvador wrote:
Mathieu Bruneau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Do you want me to add something to the website making a statement about
the coming move ?
Would be good since users won't be surprised by the change.
I guess I should add at least the new information there. Is there any
p
On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 21:35:37 -0300 Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "K.G." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Indeed there's absolutly nothing but useless forking changelog informations
> > in devel, that is not already in stable... There used to be some HFS
> > improvement before I me
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 11:05:12PM +0200, Håkon Løvdal wrote:
> On 9/9/05, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I hear the devel tree is dead, so mayeb it can fall apart.
>
> I second that. I recently checked out both stable and devel and compared
> them, and stable contained several things
Mathieu Bruneau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do you want me to add something to the website making a statement about
> the coming move ?
Would be good since users won't be surprised by the change.
> I guess I should add at least the new information there. Is there any
> plan (I may have misse
"K.G." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Indeed there's absolutly nothing but useless forking changelog informations
> in devel, that is not already in stable... There used to be some HFS
> improvement before I merged them in stable, but now devel is just an old
> stable version (or a mix of old stabl
On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 18:22:42 -0300 Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Håkon Løvdal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On 9/9/05, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I hear the devel tree is dead, so mayeb it can fall apart.
> >
> > I second that. I recently checked out both stabl
Otavio Salvador wrote:
Håkon Løvdal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On 9/9/05, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I hear the devel tree is dead, so mayeb it can fall apart.
I second that. I recently checked out both stable and devel and compared
them, and stable contained several things no
Håkon Løvdal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 9/9/05, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I hear the devel tree is dead, so mayeb it can fall apart.
>
> I second that. I recently checked out both stable and devel and compared
> them, and stable contained several things not merged to devel (u
On 9/9/05, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hear the devel tree is dead, so mayeb it can fall apart.
I second that. I recently checked out both stable and devel and compared
them, and stable contained several things not merged to devel (unit,
some constraint handling, etc). So unless som
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Otavio Salvador
Sent: Fri 9/9/2005 9:46 AM
To: bug-parted@gnu.org
Subject: Schedule migration from CVS to Subversion
Hello folks,
I was talking in IRC, at #parted channel, with Sven and we think to
migrate upstream source code
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 11:46:52AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>
> I propose to do it in next weekend (09/17) and want to ask if anybody
> have problems with that?
Go ahead, it's like I'd do it :)
Leslie
--
PGP-KID: 0x52D70289
pgpmnpa1frHSn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 11:46:52AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> I was talking in IRC, at #parted channel, with Sven and we think to
> migrate upstream source code from CVS to Subversion.
>
> I propose to do it in next weekend (09/17) and want to ask if anybody
> have problems
Hello folks,
I was talking in IRC, at #parted channel, with Sven and we think to
migrate upstream source code from CVS to Subversion.
I propose to do it in next weekend (09/17) and want to ask if anybody
have problems with that?
The proposed layout for repository is the following:
upstream/trun
13 matches
Mail list logo