Benno Schulenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Benno Schulenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > -{"no-update", no_argument, NULL, 'd'},
>> > +{"dry-run", no_argument, NULL, 'd'},
>>
>> Looks good, but do not remove support for --no-update just yet.
>> Instead, mark i
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Benno Schulenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -{"no-update", no_argument, NULL, 'd'},
> > +{"dry-run", no_argument, NULL, 'd'},
>
> Looks good, but do not remove support for --no-update just yet.
> Instead, mark it as deprecated, and with a comment suggesting
> when
Benno Schulenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> diff --git a/partprobe/partprobe.c b/partprobe/partprobe.c
> index 1659100..e79193a 100644
> --- a/partprobe/partprobe.c
> +++ b/partprobe/partprobe.c
> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
>
> static struct option const long_options[] =
>{
> -{"no-update", no_a
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Benno Schulenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Better use the same word in both cases then:
> >
> > Inform the operating system about partition table changes.
> >
> > -d, --dry-run do not actually inform the operating system
>
> Ack. Can you provide a patch for i
Benno Schulenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> In partprobe/partprobe.c it says:
>
> Inform the OS of partition table changes.
>
> -d, --no-update don't update the kernel
>
> To me "updating the kernel" means to install a new version of the
> kernel. But it seems that "don't i
