Re: Wrong partition identifier for HFS

2010-02-26 Thread Curtis Gedak
Jim Meyering wrote: Curtis Gedak wrote: (BTW, your mail client mangled the patch, so I couldn't apply it) For the next one, try to use an inline-text attachment or simply include the patch inline verbatim. Confirm that it is a faithful copy by copying the patch from your message (bef

Re: Wrong partition identifier for HFS

2010-02-26 Thread Jim Meyering
Curtis Gedak wrote: >> (BTW, your mail client mangled the patch, so I couldn't apply it) >> > I had cut and pasted the patch into Thunderbird and it was probably > wrapped at 70 characters. That would be a problem, but I can usually work around it. Whatever you did also caused the first space to b

Re: Wrong partition identifier for HFS

2010-02-26 Thread Curtis Gedak
Jim Meyering wrote: Curtis Gedak wrote: When an "hfs" partition is created on a msdos disk, the partition identifier is set to "0x83". The correct value for an HFS partition is "0xAF". Thank you! Just in time. I was about to release 2.2. I've adjusted your patch to work also with hfs+

Re: Wrong partition identifier for HFS

2010-02-26 Thread Jim Meyering
Curtis Gedak wrote: > When an "hfs" partition is created on a msdos disk, the partition > identifier is set to "0x83". The correct value for an HFS partition > is "0xAF". > > The identifier "0xAF" is used by Apple for MacOS X file systems HFS or > HFS+ on Intel. > > Following is a link to a list o