Re: GPT Question

2011-11-11 Thread Christian
On ven, 2011-11-11 at 12:55 -0500, Rod Smith wrote: > On 11/11/2011 12:00 PM, Christian wrote: > > On gio, 2011-11-10 at 15:01 +0100, Jim Meyering wrote: > > > >> Christian wrote: > >>> On mer, 2011-11-09 at 00:16 +0100, Christian wrote: > Hi, > > I created a GPT table on a file (

Re: GPT Question

2011-11-11 Thread Rod Smith
On 11/11/2011 12:00 PM, Christian wrote: > On gio, 2011-11-10 at 15:01 +0100, Jim Meyering wrote: > >> Christian wrote: >>> On mer, 2011-11-09 at 00:16 +0100, Christian wrote: Hi, I created a GPT table on a file (1 MB), using parted 2.2. Looking at the hexdump seems that the C

Re: GPT Question

2011-11-10 Thread Jim Meyering
>> Thanks, but it's not an error. >> That first sector is called the protective MBR. >> Note the "type" of EE. >> >> https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/GPT_Disk > > Oh, thanks for your response! :) > > Sorry but I'm a little confused. > > If the value of CHS (0, 0, 1 (wich corresponds

Re: GPT Question

2011-11-10 Thread Christian
On gio, 2011-11-10 at 15:01 +0100, Jim Meyering wrote: > Christian wrote: > > On mer, 2011-11-09 at 00:16 +0100, Christian wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I created a GPT table on a file (1 MB), using parted 2.2. > >> Looking at the hexdump seems that the CHS-start-sector of the GPT > >> partition may n

Re: GPT Question

2011-11-10 Thread Jim Meyering
Christian wrote: > On mer, 2011-11-09 at 00:16 +0100, Christian wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I created a GPT table on a file (1 MB), using parted 2.2. >> Looking at the hexdump seems that the CHS-start-sector of the GPT >> partition may not be correct. Those are MBR (64 byte) partitions: >> >> Status CHS

Re: GPT Question

2011-11-09 Thread Christian
On mer, 2011-11-09 at 00:16 +0100, Christian wrote: > Hi, > > I created a GPT table on a file (1 MB), using parted 2.2. > Looking at the hexdump seems that the CHS-start-sector of the GPT > partition may not be correct. Those are MBR (64 byte) partitions: > > Status CHSType CHS LBA s