On May 14, 2013, at 8:29 AM, cr...@gtek.biz wrote:
> On Saturday, May 11, 2013 04:14, "Chris Murphy"
> said:
>> So again the best
>> option is specifying the first partition start sector of 2048 (i.e. 1MB),
>> and from
>> there in whole MB increments.
> If I understand you regarding HDDs, t
On Saturday, May 11, 2013 04:14, "Chris Murphy" said:
>
> On May 10, 2013, at 1:00 PM, Ulf Zibis wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am 10.05.2013 04:52, schrieb Chris Murphy:
>>> The simplest rule of thumb is to start a partition at 1MB, and specify all
>>> partition sizes in whole MB's. It solves this, an
On May 10, 2013, at 1:00 PM, Ulf Zibis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 10.05.2013 04:52, schrieb Chris Murphy:
>> The simplest rule of thumb is to start a partition at 1MB, and specify all
>> partition sizes in whole MB's. It solves this, and maybe also for SSDs. The
>> open question is some SSDs have 2+
Hi,
Am 10.05.2013 04:52, schrieb Chris Murphy:
The simplest rule of thumb is to start a partition at 1MB, and specify all
partition sizes in whole MB's. It solves this, and maybe also for SSDs. The
open question is some SSDs have 2+MB erase block sizes and it's not clear if
there's a benefit,
On Thursday, May 9, 2013 21:52, "Chris Murphy" said:
>
> On May 9, 2013, at 8:20 AM, cr...@gtek.biz wrote:
>> In the meantime, do you mind if I post a pointer to our conversation here
>> back
>> on the Debian User list for anyone that might be following it there?
>
> No, feel free.
> The si
On May 9, 2013, at 8:20 AM, cr...@gtek.biz wrote:
> In the meantime, do you mind if I post a pointer to our conversation here
> back on the Debian User list for anyone that might be following it there?
No, feel free.
>
>>
>> It's possible in your case the warning is about another partition w
On Wednesday, May 8, 2013 16:46, "Chris Murphy" said:
> On May 8, 2013, at 2:37 PM, cr...@gtek.biz wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, May 8, 2013 13:17, "Chris Murphy"
>> said:
>>
>> Thanks for responding Chris!
>>
>>> On a 512byte physical and logical sector hard drive, the messages can be
>>> ignored
On May 8, 2013, at 2:37 PM, cr...@gtek.biz wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 8, 2013 13:17, "Chris Murphy"
> said:
>
> Thanks for responding Chris!
>
>> On a 512byte physical and logical sector hard drive, the messages can be
>> ignored.
>> Alignment isn't an issue.
>
> Wouldn't the generation of
On Wednesday, May 8, 2013 13:17, "Chris Murphy" said:
Thanks for responding Chris!
> On a 512byte physical and logical sector hard drive, the messages can be
> ignored.
> Alignment isn't an issue.
Wouldn't the generation of an error message, when no error condition exists, be
considered a bug
On a 512byte physical and logical sector hard drive, the messages can be
ignored. Alignment isn't an issue.
For SSDs which effectively lie about their physical sector size, the
consequences of miss alignment are variable the firmware.
Chris Murphy
10 matches
Mail list logo
