Re: [PATCH 4/5] Fix loop test

2011-12-23 Thread Jim Meyering
Phillip Susi wrote: > On 12/22/2011 04:54 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: >> I'd really like to have a way to run two or more scsi_debug-using >> tests in parallel but that is not possible: the kernel allows only one. >> >> Note that for many of our scsi-debug-using tests, you cannot duplicate >> the funct

Re: [PATCH 4/5] Fix loop test

2011-12-22 Thread Phillip Susi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/22/2011 04:54 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: > I'd really like to have a way to run two or more scsi_debug-using > tests in parallel but that is not possible: the kernel allows only one. > > Note that for many of our scsi-debug-using tests, you cannot

Re: [PATCH 4/5] Fix loop test

2011-12-22 Thread Jim Meyering
Phillip Susi wrote: > On 12/21/2011 1:53 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: >> FAIL: t8000-loop.sh (exit: 1) >> = >> ... >> + d1=/h/j/w/co/parted/6/tests/gt-t8000-loop.sh.NpVB/root/dev/loop1 >> + parted -s >> /h/j/w/co/parted/6/tests/gt-t8000-loop.sh.NpVB/r

Re: [PATCH 4/5] Fix loop test

2011-12-21 Thread Keshav P R
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 01:20, Phillip Susi wrote: > On 12/21/2011 1:53 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: > >> FAIL: t8000-loop.sh (exit: 1) >> = >> ... >> + d1=/h/j/w/co/parted/6/tests/**gt-t8000-loop.sh.NpVB/root/** >> dev/loop1 >> + parted -s /h/j/w/co/par

Re: [PATCH 4/5] Fix loop test

2011-12-21 Thread Phillip Susi
On 12/21/2011 1:53 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: FAIL: t8000-loop.sh (exit: 1) = ... + d1=/h/j/w/co/parted/6/tests/gt-t8000-loop.sh.NpVB/root/dev/loop1 + parted -s /h/j/w/co/parted/6/tests/gt-t8000-loop.sh.NpVB/root/dev/loop1 mklabel msdos + fa

Re: [PATCH 4/5] Fix loop test

2011-12-21 Thread Jim Meyering
Phillip Susi wrote: > On 12/21/2011 1:33 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: >> Thanks. >> This patch looks sensible, so I'll go ahead and apply it in spite >> of the current test failures I'm seeing. I trust that with your >> kernel, the new test does pass a root-run "make check". > > Can you send me the log

Re: [PATCH 4/5] Fix loop test

2011-12-21 Thread Phillip Susi
On 12/21/2011 1:33 PM, Jim Meyering wrote: Thanks. This patch looks sensible, so I'll go ahead and apply it in spite of the current test failures I'm seeing. I trust that with your kernel, the new test does pass a root-run "make check". Can you send me the log? You are running a kernel newer

Re: [PATCH 4/5] Fix loop test

2011-12-21 Thread Jim Meyering
Phillip Susi wrote: > t8001-loop-blkpg.sh relied on loop being a loadable module and loading > it with the max_part argument. This is no longer required. > > Signed-off-by: Phillip Susi > --- > tests/t8001-loop-blkpg.sh |8 > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff