Hans de Goede wrote:
> I think the comment about devfs can and should be removed too, esp.
> as we no longer test for devfs (and fallback to the reread ioctl in
> case of devfs).
Thanks. That is definitely a stale comment.
I've squashed that in:
>From 9fa0e1800db5b9f094ae481fd95a51da03f19e95 Mo
Hi,
I think the comment about devfs can and should be removed too, esp.
as we no longer test for devfs (and fallback to the reread ioctl in
case of devfs).
Regards,
Hans
On 11/22/2010 10:04 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Brian C. Lane wrote:
---
libparted/arch/linux.c | 23 ++-
Brian C. Lane wrote:
> ---
> libparted/arch/linux.c | 23 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libparted/arch/linux.c b/libparted/arch/linux.c
> index 38f4e31..435cb46 100644
> --- a/libparted/arch/linux.c
> +++ b/libparted/arch/linux.c
...
