On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 11:50:29 +0200
Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Jarvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Kenny is away on holiday from today so it is probable (but not certain
> > as he has been known to logon and get on with these things) that
> > the patch won't be ready by F
James Jarvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kenny is away on holiday from today so it is probable (but not certain
> as he has been known to logon and get on with these things) that
> the patch won't be ready by Friday.
Thanks for letting us know.
__
Dear Jim,
Jim Meyering wrote:
Kenneth MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 16:00 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
[resending, just to you three, since your mail server blocked
my 3-yr-spam-free static IP [82.230.74.64]]
Which mail server? If it's one of ours I
Kenneth MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 16:00 +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> [resending, just to you three, since your mail server blocked
>> my 3-yr-spam-free static IP [82.230.74.64]]
>
> Which mail server? If it's one of ours I can chase up our mail guys.
ed.ac.uk.
Kenneth MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> parted 1.8.7 (git trunk seems to be the same)
>
> The comparison of fs_type->name to "linux-swap" no longer catches Linux
> swap partitions as they're called either "linux-swap(new)" or
> "linux-swap(old)". This means, at least in the DOS label code,
parted 1.8.7 (git trunk seems to be the same)
The comparison of fs_type->name to "linux-swap" no longer catches Linux
swap partitions as they're called either "linux-swap(new)" or
"linux-swap(old)". This means, at least in the DOS label code, creating
Linux swap partitions results in the system (
