On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 12:45:46PM -0400, Mbuc wrote:
> [mbuc83@localhost ~]$ *parted /dev/mapper/rl-root*
> WARNING: You are not superuser. Watch out for permissions.
> /dev/mapper/control: open failed: Permission denied
> Failure to communicate with kernel device-mapper driver.
> Incompatible li
[mbuc83@localhost ~]$ *parted /dev/mapper/rl-root*
WARNING: You are not superuser. Watch out for permissions.
/dev/mapper/control: open failed: Permission denied
Failure to communicate with kernel device-mapper driver.
Incompatible libdevmapper 1.02.198-RHEL9 (2024-05-16) and kernel driver
(unkn
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 12:38:14AM -0700, pusp raj joshi wrote:
> Dear GNU Parted Development Team,
>
> I am writing to report a bug I encountered while using GNU Parted version
> 2.4.62-ce5e-dirty on a VMware ESXi 7.0 Update 3 system.
>
> *Description of the Bug:* The *partedUtil* command does n
/disks read-write (Is a directory).
/dev/disks has been opened read-only.
*Warning:* Could not determine sector size for /dev/disks: Function not
implemented. Using the default sector size (512). A bug has been detected
in GNU Parted. Please email a bug report to bug-parted@gnu.org containing
at least
On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 09:15:46PM +0200, Jorge González wrote:
> 2.4.62-ce5e-dirty
> Unable to determine the size of
> /vmfs/volumes/50a4ecca-fc4c7f2a-c4bd-776f5cec6c60 (Inap
> propriate ioctl for device).
> Unable to get device altbootbank
That doesn't really look like a parted pro
2.4.62-ce5e-dirty
Unable to determine the size of
/vmfs/volumes/50a4ecca-fc4c7f2a-c4bd-776f5cec6c60 (Inap
propriate ioctl for device).
Unable to get device altbootbank
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 01:25:30PM +, Blåfield Toni wrote:
> Got an error, here are the details:
>
> You found a bug in GNU Parted! Here's what you have to do:
>
> Don't panic! The bug has most likely not affected any of your data.
> Help us to fix this bug by doing the following:
>
> Check
Got an error, here are the details:
You found a bug in GNU Parted! Here's what you have to do:
Don't panic! The bug has most likely not affected any of your data.
Help us to fix this bug by doing the following:
Check whether the bug has already been fixed by checking
the last version of GNU Part
On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 12:59:29AM +, Sharma, Pranav wrote:
> Command: parted DEVICE unit co print unit s print
>
> Output:
> Error: /dev/sdc: unrecognised disk label
> Model: Msft Virtual Disk (scsi)
> Disk /dev/sdc: 1098GB
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/4096B
> Partition Table: unkno
Command: parted DEVICE unit co print unit s print
Output:
Error: /dev/sdc: unrecognised disk label
Model: Msft Virtual Disk (scsi)
Disk /dev/sdc: 1098GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/4096B
Partition Table: unknown
Disk Flags:
Error: /dev/sdc: unrecognised disk label
Model: Msft Virtual Disk
Hello,
The "mktable" command of parted (the alias for "mklabel") is
undocumented in the man page and all official documentation I can
find. It would be nice for this behavior to be documented.
Thanks!
Jason
On 11/8/2017 4:37 AM, Roy Dyton wrote:
> message: Assertion (metadata_length > 0) at
> ../../../libparted/labels/dos.c:2313 in function
> add_logical_part_metadata() failed.
> Aborted
> redboy@RedBoy-Satellite-L350:~$
Please provide the output of parted /dev/sda u s print ( or whichever
block dev
On 11/6/2017 9:16 AM, Rootless wrote:
> Didn't try it again the same way and was successful. The volume has data on
> it now, so no problems here.
Then I'm closing the report.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
submitting! Please e-mail a bug report to
bug-parted@gnu.org containing at least the version (3.2) and the following
message: Assertion (metadata_length > 0) at
../../../libparted/labels/dos.c:2313 in function
add_logical_part_metadata() failed.
Aborted
redboy@RedBoy-Satellite-L350:~$
Didn't try it again the same way and was successful. The volume has data on
it now, so no problems here.
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Phil Susi wrote:
> On 11/3/2017 9:23 AM, Rootless wrote:
> > It is GPT partitioned. I was able to succeed doing it differently.
> > I'm home sick, but can get
On 11/3/2017 9:23 AM, Rootless wrote:
> It is GPT partitioned. I was able to succeed doing it differently.
> I'm home sick, but can get you those first 64 sectors if they are
> still useful.
Only if you are still getting the error.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
It is GPT partitioned. I was able to succeed doing it differently. I'm home
sick, but can get you those first 64 sectors if they are still useful.
Please let me know.
On November 3, 2017 8:40:35 AM EDT, Phil Susi wrote:
>On 10/20/2017 5:05 PM, Rootless wrote:
>> Assertion (max_size > 0) at ../.
On 10/20/2017 5:05 PM, Rootless wrote:
> Assertion (max_size > 0) at ../../libparted/cs/constraint.c:71 in function
> ped_constraint_init() failed.
Is this disk also partitioned using GPT? Can you dd and compress the
first 64 sectors and post that so I can try to reproduce it?
signature.asc
D
GNU Parted 3.2
Using /dev/cciss/c1d1
Welcome to GNU Parted! Type 'help' to view a list of commands.
(parted) print
Model: Compaq Smart Array (cpqarray)
Disk /dev/cciss/c1d1: 587GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: gpt
Disk Flags:
Number Start EndSize File system
> 1: partprobe() [0x8048efd]
> A bug has been detected in GNU Parted. Refer to the web site of parted
> http://www.gnu.org/software/parted/parted.html for more information of what
> could be useful for bug submitting! Please email a bug report to
> bug-parted@gnu.org co
eful for bug submitting! Please email a bug report to
bug-parted@gnu.org containing at least the version (2.3) and the following
message: Assertion (head_size <= 63) at
../../../libparted/labels/dos.c:662 in function probe_partition_for_geom()
failed.
# partprobe -v
partprobe (GNU parted) 2.3
Copyrigh
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 04:32:25AM +, martha salibongcogon wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I run partrobe command after creating a partition on my ubuntu 15.04 machine.
> I get this error.
>
>
> Assertion (metadata_length > 0) at ../../../libparted/labels/dos.c:2313 in
> function add_logical_part_met
Hi,
I run partrobe command after creating a partition on my ubuntu 15.04 machine.
I get this error.
Assertion (metadata_length > 0) at ../../../libparted/labels/dos.c:2313 in
function add_logical_part_metadata() failed.
?Please let me know what i should do.
Thanks.
Regards,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm not sure this isn't actually intentional. What should parted do
when run in scripting mode? There all exceptions are unhandled, so a
sane default action must be taken. I think this particular error
really should be a warning, and the default is
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 01:09:04PM +, Nugent, Bill wrote:
> In case I forget I wanted to report a bug with parted where Control-C is
> treated as an OK response. I was testing how parted handled a corrupt
> primary GPT and was rewarded with parted asking if I wanted to use the backup
> GPT
In case I forget I wanted to report a bug with parted where Control-C is
treated as an OK response. I was testing how parted handled a corrupt primary
GPT and was rewarded with parted asking if I wanted to use the backup GPT
instead with the prompt: "OK/Cancel? " I typed Control-C and it took i
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 10:10:12AM +0100, Vitalii Lysov wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> I was practicing my partitioning skills inside of virtualbox. And I just got
> a segmentation fault. I hope this info could help you to fix a bug, if there
> is some.
>
> My environment is Virtual Box with Knoppix 7.
Hello guys,
I was practicing my partitioning skills inside of virtualbox. And I just
got a segmentation fault. I hope this info could help you to fix a bug,
if there is some.
My environment is Virtual Box with Knoppix 7.4.2 Live DVD.
I attached a file with my console output.
If you need any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 1/9/2015 2:38 PM, Hans Ameel wrote:
> I have a disk with what seems a corrupt GPT partition table.
>
> When using parted in a stock installation of Debian 7; I get the
> folowing dump;
>
> I hope to have been of service reporting this bug. Glad to
I did not try with version 3.2.
Debian seems to have version 2.3 in its repositories.
I will try and see if I can get the newest version on my system.
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 8:53 PM, Håkon Løvdal wrote:
> On 9 January 2015 at 20:38, Hans Ameel wrote:
> > GNU Parted 2.3
>
> Hi. Version 2.3 is
On 9 January 2015 at 20:38, Hans Ameel wrote:
> GNU Parted 2.3
Hi. Version 2.3 is very old. Do you get the same result with the
newest version 3.2?
BR Håkon Løvdal
I have a disk with what seems a corrupt GPT partition table.
When using parted in a stock installation of Debian 7; I get the folowing
dump;
I hope to have been of service reporting this bug. Glad to answer any
inquerries
Kind regards,
Hans
root@LAB:~# parted /dev/sdd
GNU Parted 2.3
Using /de
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 12:51:37PM +, Matt Smith wrote:
> Hello Devs,
>
> I don't know how to check if the bug has been fixed. The webpage wasn't
> clear on how to check. I assume that because 3.1 is the latest version and
> also the version that I'm using, that the bug still exists in 3.1
Hello Devs,
I don't know how to check if the bug has been fixed. The webpage wasn't clear
on how to check. I assume that because 3.1 is the latest version and also the
version that I'm using, that the bug still exists in 3.1.
The command I entered:
(parted) disk_set boot on
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xfd)
> [0x7fc80d7f4ead] 1: partprobe() [0x401249] A bug has been detected
> in GNU Parted. Refer to the web site of parted
> http://www.gnu.org/software/parted/parted.html for more information
> of what could be useful for bug submitting
[0x401249]
> A bug has been detected in GNU Parted. Refer to the web site of parted
> http://www.gnu.org/software/parted/parted.html for more information of
> what could be useful for bug submitting! Please email a bug report to
> bug-parted@gnu.org containing at leas
: partprobe() [0x401249]
A bug has been detected in GNU Parted. Refer to the web site of parted
http://www.gnu.org/software/parted/parted.html for more information of
what could be useful for bug submitting! Please email a bug report to
bug-parted@gnu.org containing at least the version (2.3) and the
; Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
> Partition Table: loop
> Disk Flags:
>
> Number Start End Size Filesystem Flags
>1 0s 2097151s 2097152s fat32
>
>
> [/output]
>
>
> First time I've ever submitted a bug report; I hope
Flags
1 0s 2097151s 2097152s fat32
[/output]
First time I've ever submitted a bug report; I hope I was of help.
Regards,
Dave
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Sara Walsh wrote:
> Version 1.8.9
> Assertion (cluster >=2 && cluster < fs_info->cluster_count + 2) at
> calc.c:378 in function fat_cluster_to_frag()failed.
Thanks for the report. However, parted-1.8.9 is very old, and I'm
pretty sure that bug has been fixed in
Version 1.8.9
Assertion (cluster >=2 && cluster < fs_info->cluster_count + 2) at
calc.c:378 in function fat_cluster_to_frag()failed.
I'm not sure I can. It is software to recover/flash the hardware. I wish I
knew how to fix it.
Georgia
On Jun 5, 2013 11:18 AM, "Brian C. Lane" wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 08:02:22PM -1000, Georgia Nelsen wrote:
> > version 1.8.9
> > Assertion (cluster >= 2 && cluster < fs_info->cluster_co
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 08:02:22PM -1000, Georgia Nelsen wrote:
> version 1.8.9
> Assertion (cluster >= 2 && cluster < fs_info->cluster_count + 2) at
> clac.c:378 in function fat_cluster_to_frag() failed.
>
> thanks
> Georgia
Thanks for the report, but v1.8.9 is *really* old at this point. You
s
version 1.8.9
Assertion (cluster >= 2 && cluster < fs_info->cluster_count + 2) at
clac.c:378 in function fat_cluster_to_frag() failed.
thanks
Georgia
On 18 March 2012 03:09, Nileshwar, Siddharth wrote:
> I received this message for version 1.8.9
This version is very, very old and a lot of problems have been fixed since then.
I recommend to try the latest version (3.1 as of now).
ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/parted/
BR Håkon Løvdal
Please help
I received this message for version 1.8.9
Assertion (cluster >= 2 && cluster < fs_info->cluster_count + 2) at calc.c:378
in function fat_cluster_to_frag() failed.
Sid Nileshwar
Hello,
sorry, if this is not the best way to report it, but i want to inform you about
an issue that parted reported me.
--- report ---
GNU Parted 3.0
Using /dev/sdc
Welcome to GNU Parted! Type 'help' to view a list of commands.
(parted) p
[0xb7570cc6]
> 1: partprobe() [0x8048bd1]
> A bug has been detected in GNU Parted. Refer to the web site of
> parted http://www.gnu.org/software/parted/parted.html for more
> information of what could be useful for bug submitting! Please email
> a bug report to bug-parted@gnu.org
/parted/parted.html for more
information of what could be useful for bug submitting! Please email
a bug report to bug-parted@gnu.org containing at least the version
(2.3) and the following message: Assertion (cyl_size <= 255 * 63) at
dos.c:649 in function probe_partition_for_geom() failed.
Abor
Refer to the
> web site of parted http://www.gnu.org/software/parted/parted.html for
> more informations of what could be useful for bug submitting! Please
> email a bug report to bug-parted@gnu.org containing at least the
> version (1.8.9) and the following message: Assert
are/parted/parted.html for
more informations of what could be useful for bug submitting! Please
email a bug report to bug-parted@gnu.org containing at least the
version (1.8.9) and the following message: Assertion (cluster >= 2 &&
cluster < fs_info->cluster_count + 2
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 01:57:39PM +1000, Signups wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just thought I'd pop this through; using MeeGo, I created an Ext4 USB
> thumb drive which seemingly cannot be touched!
>
Thanks for the report. This has been fixed in newer versions of parted.
You can work around it by removing t
l for more informations of
what could be useful for bug submitting! Please email a bug report to
bug-parted@gnu.org containing at least the version (1.9.0) and the
following message: Assertion (head_size <= 63) at dos.c:643 in function
probe_partition_for_geom() failed.
Backtrace has 8 calls
This has been fixed in parted v2.4
The problem is that parted has failed to guess the CHS layout of the
disk. You can work around this problem (assuming you can erase the data
on the disk) by removing the partitioning and re-partitioning it with
parted.
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/diskname bs=1M cou
bb)
[0xb778a9cb]
A bug has been detected in GNU Parted. Refer to the web site of parted
http://www.gnu.org/software/parted/parted.html for more information of what
could be useful for bug submitting! Please email a bug report to
bug-parted@gnu.org containing at least the version (2.3) and the fo
l5/5.10.1/i386-linux-thread-multi/CORE/libperl.so
> (Perl_pp_entersub+0x56e) [0x489181ee]
> A bug has been detected in GNU Parted. Refer to the web site of parted
> http://
> www.gnu.org/software/parted/parted.html for more information of what could be
> useful for bug submitting! P
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 06:53:12PM -0700, Richard Gradle wrote:
> The problem reported below was caused by the presence of a USB thumb drive on
> one of the USB ports.
>
> When I removed the thumb drive, the Parted software executed without problem.
>
> The problem repeated when I was running up
and parts of the update failed for the
reason below. Removal of the thumb drive again resolved the problem.
Hope this helps.
Rich Gradle
- Forwarded Message -
From: Richard Gradle
To: "bug-parted@gnu.org"
Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2011 9:19 PM
Subject: Bug Report
While
web site of parted
http://www.gnu.org/software/parted/parted.html for more information of what
could be useful for bug submitting! Please email a bug report to
bug-parted@gnu.org containing at least the version (2.3) and the following
message: Assertion (head_size <= 63) at dos.c:661 in funct
on of what
could be useful for bug submitting! Please email a bug report to
bug-parted@gnu.org containing at least the version (2.3) and the following
message: Assertion (head_size <= 63) at dos.c:661 in function
probe_partition_for_geom() failed.
Aborted (core dumped)
I can manually pa
tting! Please email a bug report to
bug-parted@gnu.org containing at least the version (2.3) and the following
message: Assertion (head_size <= 63) at ../../../libparted/labels/dos.c:662
in function probe_partition_for_geom() failed."
when i ran command "fdisk -l" on my desk top. I h
All,
Received the following error after performing "sudo parted -l" in a Linux
Mint 10 Live DVD environment:
Assertion ((C * heads + H) * sectors + S == A) at
../../../libparted/labels/dos.c:682 in function probe_partition_for_geom()
failed.
Aborted
The only commands I'd done previously were "m
Thanks a lot for your quick and clear answer, I´ll try.
2011/2/13 Curtis Gedak
> On 11-02-13 03:43 AM, Carlos Gonzalez Lopez wrote:
>
>> Thanks, is there anything I can do for using that Flashdrive with parted
>> or is it impossible?
>>
>
> Carlos,
>
> I can see at least two possible solutions:
On 11-02-13 03:43 AM, Carlos Gonzalez Lopez wrote:
Thanks, is there anything I can do for using that Flashdrive with
parted or is it impossible?
Carlos,
I can see at least two possible solutions:
OPTION A)
One work-around is as follows:
1) Copy any data you have on this disk device to anoth
Thanks, is there anything I can do for using that Flashdrive with parted or
is it impossible?
2011/2/11 Curtis Gedak
> Carlos,
>
> Using the equations noted in the probe_partition_for_geom() method in the
> parted file libparted/labels/dos.c, I ran the calculations using the values
> from the MB
Carlos,
Using the equations noted in the probe_partition_for_geom() method in
the parted file libparted/labels/dos.c, I ran the calculations using the
values from the MBR you provided.
Variable Description / Calculation Value
c Starting cylinder 1
h Starting head 0
s Starting sector – 1 = 0
a
Curtis,
Here you have...and I paste its content just in case you prefer not to open
the file:
FA 31 C0 8E D8 8E D0 BC 00 7C 89 E6 06 57 8E C0 .1...|...W..
0010 FB FC BF 00 06 B9 00 01 F3 A5 EA 1F 06 00 00 52 ...R
0020 52 B4 41 BB AA 55 31 C9 30 F6 F9 CD 13 72 1
Carlos,
Would you be able to provide a copy of the Master Boot Record which is
contained in the first sector of the device?
You can capture the Master Boot Record in a file with the following command:
NOTE: Be extra careful to type this command in properly, otherwise loss
of data could resul
Yes. But fdisk output is:
*17 heads*, 17 sectors per track
I supposed that that was the value to compare with head_size<=63 but I must
be wrong.
2011/2/2 Brian C. Lane
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:47:21PM +0100, Carlos Gonzalez Lopez wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Version 2.3
> >
> > Error message
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:47:21PM +0100, Carlos Gonzalez Lopez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Version 2.3
>
> Error message: The sentence (head_size <= 63) in
> ../../../libparted/labels/dos.c:662 in the function
> probe_partition_for_geom() has failed.
> Aborted
>
This is yet another example of a flash
My apologies for sending this again. But I have not received any answer
(perhaps my fault, because i ask for entering the mailing list at the same
time...). If someone sent it I would ask him to send it again.
I add now the output of fdisk
$ sudo fdisk -l -u /dev/sdg
Disco /dev/sdg: 3997 MB,
Hello,
Version 2.3
Error message: The sentence (head_size <= 63) in
../../../libparted/labels/dos.c:662 in the function
probe_partition_for_geom() has failed.
Aborted
Output of
parted DEVICE unit co print unit s print
Backtrace tiene 14 llamadas en espera:
14: /lib/libparted.so.0(ped_ass
Running Mandriva 2010.1, with parted 2.2. This desn't happen all the time,
but is not random. It stays for a while then goes away for a while.
Trying to run Mandriva's "rebootin" command (which is supposed to run more
easily with LILO and Mandriva now uses GRUB as standard) to reboot into a
n
Hi
I was running 'gnome-format' at got the following message:
' A bug has been detected in GNU Parted. Refer to the web site of
parted http://www.gnu.org/software/parted/parted.html for more information
of what could be useful for bug submitting! Please e-mail a bug repor
A bug has been detected in GNU Parted. Refer to the web site of parted
http://www.gnu.org/software/parted/parted.html for more information of what
could be useful for bug submitting! Please email a bug report to
bug-parted@gnu.org containing at least the version (2.2) and the following
message
+0xfd) [0x7f82195cdc4d]
1: fdisk() [0x404119]
A bug has been detected in GNU Parted. Refer to the web site of parted
http://www.gnu.org/software/parted/parted.html for
more information of what could be useful for bug submitting! Please email a
bug report to bug-parted@gnu.org containing at
least
holger.spangenb...@rzf.fin-nrw.de wrote:
> I011-29:/ # partprobe
> A bug has been detected in GNU Parted. Refer to the web site of parted
> http://
> www.gnu.org/software/parted/parted.html for more informations of what could be
> useful for bug submitting! Please email a bu
ftware/parted/parted.html for more information of what could be
> useful for bug submitting! Please email a bug report to bug-parted@gnu.org
> containing at least the version (2.2) and the following message: Assertion
> (head_size <= 63) at dos.c:659 in function probe_partition_for_geom(
I011-29:/ # partprobe
A bug has been detected in GNU Parted. Refer to the web site of parted
http://www.gnu.org/software/parted/parted.html for more informations of what
could be useful for bug submitting! Please email a bug report to
bug-parted@gnu.org containing at least the version
email a bug report to bug-parted@gnu.org
containing at least the version (2.2) and the following message:
Assertion (head_size <= 63) at dos.c:659 in function
probe_partition_for_geom() failed.
Aborted
___
bug-parted mailing list
bug-parted@gnu.
The terminal window attached
Ubunty 8.04 LTS, just a few minutes ago installed updates (moscow time 05
March, 19.41)
I had created with gparted on Wd20EARS (4k sector, 512 sector reported to OS)
ext3 partition, alike
http://community.wdc.com/t5/Desktop/Problem-with-WD-Advanced-Format-drive-in-LI
Hi,
I tried to add a ticket with this text but I keep getting an internal
server error, so here it is:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=586910
Sometimes when GParted is used to modify partitions on a Mac, it changes the
GPT but not the MBR. So the MBR does not correctly reflect the new
A bug has been detected in GNU Parted. Refer to the web site of
parted http://www.gnu.org/software/parted/parted.html for more
informations of what could be useful for bug submitting! Please email
a bug report to bug-parted@gnu.org containing at least the version
(1.8.9) and the following
(main+0x168) [0x401fe8]
2: /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe6) [0x7fbc78580586]
1: partprobe [0x401af9]
A bug has been detected in GNU Parted. Refer to the web site of parted
parted.html for more informations of what could be useful for bug submitting!
Please email a bug report to bug
version (1.8.9)
message: Assertion (disk != NULL) at ../../libparted/disk.c:1337 in
function ped_disk_next_partition() failed
Good luck!
Martino
___
bug-parted mailing list
bug-parted@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-parted
Debarshi Ray wrote:
following message:
Assertion ((C * heads + H) * sectors + S == A) at disk_dos.c:586 in
function probe_partition_for_geom()
failed.
Thank you for the bug report. 1.6.22 is a very old version of Parted.
Is it possible for you to try out Parted 1.8.8 [1] and see if you
> following message:
>
> Assertion ((C * heads + H) * sectors + S == A) at disk_dos.c:586 in
> function probe_partition_for_geom()
> failed.
Thank you for the bug report. 1.6.22 is a very old version of Parted.
Is it possible for you to try out Parted 1.8.8 [1] and see if you
encou
following message:
Assertion ((C * heads + H) * sectors + S == A) at disk_dos.c:586 in
function probe_partition_for_geom()
failed.
___
bug-parted mailing list
bug-parted@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-parted
Had this message reported from OpenFiler 2.3
[EMAIL PROTECTED] LINUX]# partprobe
A bug has been detected in GNU parted. Please email a bug report to
bug-parted@gnu.org containing the version (1.6.22) and the following
message:Assertion ((PedSector) PED_LE64_TO_CPU (gpt.AlternateLBA) <=
d
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/bobheaps# qtparted
Error: Can't have overlapping partitions.
A bug has been detected in GNU Parted. Refer to the web site of parted
http://www.gnu.org/software/parted/parted.html for more informations of
what could be useful for bug submitting! Please email a bug r
Refer to the web site of parted
http://www.gnu.org/software/parted/parted.html for more informations of what
could be useful for bug submitting! Please email a bug report to
bug-parted@gnu.org containing at least the version (1.6.25.1) and the
following message: Assertion (dev->open_count >
the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
FITNESS FOR
A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details.
Using /dev/uba
(parted) p
You found a bug in GNU Parted. Please email a bug report to
bug-parted@gnu.org containing the version (1.6.21), and the following
message
on for /vmfs/devices/disks/vml.02000260060160
64e11a0076a92bc8e63bdc11524149442035
[2008-07-01 14:04:33.859 'Partitionsvc' 83733424 warning] Status : 255
Output:
Error : A bug has been detected in GNU parted. Please email a bug report to
bug-parted@gnu.org containing the vers
Hi John,
You can open new bugs for GParted at:
http://gparted.sourceforge.net/bugs.php
GParted is a graphical front that uses the libparted library from the
Parted project.
Regards,
Curtis Gedak
John Kruiniger wrote:
When I use gparted to increase the size of a FAT32 partition from 12Gb
When I use gparted to increase the size of a FAT32 partition from 12Gb
to 40Gb, (or if I copy a 12Gb FAT32 partition to a brand new 40Gb
partition) then the resultant partition has an error. A small yellow
warning sign is displayed and "Info" gives an error about being unable
to read some inf
RHEL 4/Update 5
parted version (1.6.19)
After inserting my USB thumb drive, I entered parted interactive and
selected /dev/sdh, then print, at which point I was prompted to enter a
bug report with the following information:
Assertion ((C * heads + H) * sectors + S == A) at disk_dos.c:582 in
JJK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A bug has been detected in GNU Parted. Refer to the web site of
> parted http://www.gnu.org/software/parted/parted.html for more
> informations of what could be useful for bug submitting! Please email
> a bug report to bug-parted@gnu.org conta
te of
parted http://www.gnu.org/software/parted/parted.html for more
informations of what could be useful for bug submitting! Please email
a bug report to bug-parted@gnu.org containing at least the version
(1.8.7) and the following message: Assertion (disk != NULL) at
disk.c:1337 in fun
My Terminal gave me this information, I should send it to you.
Assertion (disk != NULL) at ../../libparted/disk.c:1319 in function
ped_disk_next_partition() failed.
___
bug-parted mailing list
bug-parted@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinf
Error: Can't have overlapping partitions.
A bug has been detected in GNU Parted. Refer to the web site of parted
http://www.gnu.org/software/parted/parted.html for more informations of what
could be useful for bug submitting! Please email a bug report to
bug-parted@gnu.org containing at
1 - 100 of 184 matches
Mail list logo
