Brian C. Lane wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:10:46AM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
>
> Thanks for the changes, I especially like the operators aligned at the
> start.
:-) I'll take that as an ACK, and have pushed the change.
___
bug-parted mailing li
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:10:46AM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
Thanks for the changes, I especially like the operators aligned at the
start.
--
Brian C. Lane | Anaconda Team | IRC: bcl #anaconda | Port Orchard, WA (PST8PDT)
pgplNuVeZVnnf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
Brian C. Lane wrote:
> To better support 4k sector drives this changes the
> linux_get_optimum_alignment() function to prefer aligning partitions to
> DEFAULT_ALIGNMENT (1048576) if possible.
>
> This also modifies the alignment test to take this change into account.
> ---
> include/parted/parted.
On 10 December 2010 20:26, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> +#define DEFAULT_ALIGNMENT 1048576
Could we instead have this as
#define DEFAULT_ALIGNMENT (1024 * 1024)
because to me 1048576 appears to be a magic number
and while I understand that this number is highly unlikely
to be anything oth
NOTE: This applies cleanly to parted-2.1 and parted-2.3
To better support 4k sector drives this changes the
linux_get_optimum_alignment() function to prefer aligning partitions to
DEFAULT_ALIGNMENT (1048576) if possible.
This also modifies the alignment test to take this change into account.
---
