Re: [PATCH] Add support for SD/MMC storage cards on Linux

2008-09-17 Thread Harald Welte
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 02:49:54PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote: > While we wait for the copyright paperwork to go through, > it'd be nice for me if you'd resubmit the patches in > "git format-patch" form. I'm familiar with format-patch, no problem ;) > > +snprintf (id, sizeof(i

Re: [PATCH] Add support for SD/MMC storage cards on Linux

2008-09-17 Thread Harald Welte
Hi Otavio, thanks for your response. On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 09:24:47AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > Here is an incremental patch to add support for the SD/MMC card type and > > name > > from sysfs to the parted device name. > > For this one we'd need a copyright assigment. It is big enou

Re: [PATCH] Add support for SD/MMC storage cards on Linux

2008-09-17 Thread Jim Meyering
Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 08:52:22AM +0800, Harald Welte wrote: > >> Can you please review (and possibly apply) the following patch? > > Here is an incremental patch to add support for the SD/MMC card type and name > from sysfs to the parted device name. Hi

Re: [PATCH] Add support for SD/MMC storage cards on Linux

2008-09-17 Thread Otavio Salvador
Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 08:52:22AM +0800, Harald Welte wrote: > >> Can you please review (and possibly apply) the following patch? > > Here is an incremental patch to add support for the SD/MMC card type and name > from sysfs to the parted device name.

Re: [PATCH] Add support for SD/MMC storage cards on Linux

2008-09-16 Thread Harald Welte
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 08:52:22AM +0800, Harald Welte wrote: > Can you please review (and possibly apply) the following patch? Here is an incremental patch to add support for the SD/MMC card type and name from sysfs to the parted device name. The output of 'parted -l' now looks like: Model:

[PATCH] Add support for SD/MMC storage cards on Linux

2008-09-16 Thread Harald Welte
Hi! Can you please review (and possibly apply) the following patch? I think it's pretty straight forward and not copytightable, thus no copyright assignment (and no Authors entry) should be required. If you believe different, please point me where to get the copyright assignment form that I need