> Thats a shame :(.
Yes it is. But alas, I will have to take the time and try out later versions.
I was hoping that one or more of the developers would be able to respond to the
list and tell me.
> Well, I've been using parted for my partitioning needs for quite some
> time and it seem to wor
estion, if parted doesn't
create the partition tables correctly, why use parted only??? Then you still
have a broken image that you couldn't mount for squat.
-Nathan
- Original Message -
From: "Joel Granados"
To: "Nathan Boettcher"
Cc: bug-parted@gnu.org
Sent
I have been trying to use parted to help automate the creation of a disk image
that I can then write to a card/disk/etc. I use sfdisk to partition the image
due to parted's inability to update/create the partition table (or at least I
can't figure out how to do it with parted)...part of which i
ed -s temp.dd rm 3'. 2nd partition (the empty one) was also
deleted. 1st partition remains.
Expected outcome: partition 3 should be deleted without affecting any other
partitions.
Actual outcome: partition 3 and any previous 'empty' partitions are deleted.
--
Nathan Boettcher
