On 5/24/07, ajay parashar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I am using fedora 6. i write a simple hello world kernel module
i write following makefile for building this module.
###
obj-m+=hello.o
all:
make -c /lib/modules/ $(shell uname -r)/ build M=$(PWD) modules
cl
On 1/24/09, Noah Slater wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I have been using make to regenerate output documents as I write them in a
> source format. This might involve writing in AsciiDoc and having make pick up
> changes, generating a HTML page for me to preview my work.
>
> To aid the writing process I usu
On 11/19/09, He Yunlong-B20256 wrote:
>
>
> Hi, Experts:
>
> We met build errors with "[gdb] make -j8" for serveral times, but it's
> ok to build with "-j1", we wonder whether this is some known issue, and is
> it possible that something wrong in Makefile? We are using gnu make 3.81.
>
Hello,
On 11/19/09, He Yunlong-B20256 wrote:
> Hi, Mike,
>
> Thanks very much for your patient clarification, is "one task"
> only done by "one job"?
I'm not sure what you mean by "task" here. Make has a concept of a
"job", as you can see by searching around the help documentation. I
think each
On 4/28/10, Robert Jørgensgaard Engdahl wrote:
>
> Hello GNU Make bug-list subscribers
>
> On
>
> http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/make.html#Automatic-Prerequisites
>
> The rule for automatically generating prerequisites is
>
> %.d: %.c
> @set -e; rm -f $@; \
> $
On 4/29/10, Edward Welbourne wrote:
> > If an update to new source code, that would compile just fine in a clean
> > checkout, breaks the incremental build, the build system is errornuous.
>
>
> I would like to agree with you, but this constraint is, in general,
> incompatible with incremental b
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Vardhan, Sundara (GE Energy)
wrote:
> Hi Michael
>
> During parallel makes if the time of the object files created and the
> time archive command is run is within a second then it will fail to
> include these object files. The reason I believe is due to a bug in ma
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 12:57 PM, John Westing wrote:
> I made a typo in my previous email: The following make file duplicates the
> problem, the one in the previous email does not:
>
> a.d:
> gcc -m32 -MM -o $@ a.c
> sed 's!a.o!$@ a.o!' --in-place $@
>
> a.o:
> gc
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 3:57 PM, David Boyce
wrote:
> My view is that this is really a variant of the longstanding
> discussion about getting make to not rely on timestamps at all and use
> MD5 or similar digital signatures instead. There are a number of
> reasons why timestamps can be insufficie
On 7/12/05, Ted Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> What is the proper way to insert commas into each word of a GNU Make
> variable?
>
> I want to change FOO something like this:
>
> FOO := a b c d e
> FOO := $(patsubst %,-Wl,-y,%_,$(FOO))
>
> to get
>
> -Wl,-y,a_ -Wl
On 11/11/05, Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> %% "Marty Leisner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> ml> ifneq (,$(findstring clean,$(MAKECMDGOALS)))
> ml> NO_DEPENDS=1
> ml> endif
>
> ml> ifndef NO_DEPENDS
> ml> -include $(DEPS)
> ml> endif
>
> ml> I've seen this annoying behav
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 4:18 AM Masahiro Yamada <
yamada.masah...@socionext.com> wrote:
> Hello.
>
>
> Seems no more feedback for this regression report.
>
> OK, the Linux kernel build system is too complicated.
> So, I have come back with a much simpler test-case.
>
> Here, the test-case is only
12 matches
Mail list logo
