If so, could you please post it again, rebased on the current Git
master?
There is an issue here:I noticed that when I was trying to build
(cross-compile) Make for Windows using a gcc + mingw-w64
cross-compiler (using Autotools, not build_w32.bat), there was a
big difference depending on wheth
> From: Costas Argyris
> Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 12:52:54 +
> Cc: bug-make@gnu.org, Paul Smith
>
> > If so, could you please post it again, rebased on the current Git
> > master?
>
> There is an issue here:I noticed that when I was trying to build
> (cross-compile) Make for Windows using
You can submit diffs against the last released version here as well.
In that case, I am simply re-attaching the patch I originally sent in
this thread, because that was already developed and built on 4.4.1
tarball which is still the latest AFAICT.
Just reminding that these changes are in Makefile
On Tue, 21 Mar 2023 15:08:52 +
Costas Argyris wrote:
> I am simply re-attaching the patch I originally sent in
> this thread, because that was already developed and built on 4.4.1
> tarball which is still the latest AFAICT.
Yes, at the time of this writing version 4.4.1 is the latest release
On Tue, 2023-03-21 at 12:52 +, Costas Argyris wrote:
> When trying from git, which was my first attempt, I was getting
> compilation warnings which were turning themselves into errors,
> so I never managed to build.
>
> When I used the sources extracted from the tarball though, this
> simply w
Yes I eventually found out about the maintainer mode by searching
for where -Werror is coming from, that's how I ended up using the
tarball (because there is no maintainer mode there).
Didn't know about README.git though - this does have a lot of info
indeed, thanks!
On Tue, 21 Mar 2023 at 17:24,
