I'd hoped to put out a second RC last week but I've had some work
emergencies that have been wreaking havoc with my schedule since last
Friday. Things appear to be more or less under control and so I expect
to get it out this week, with some fixes from Dmitry and PaulE.
FYI...
Follow-up Comment #15, bug #63157 (project make):
FWIW, I do consider this a regression, since these things weren't even created
before.
Now, after some weeks of trying make 4.3.90, I get a number of empty files and
named pipes lying around -- probably from aborted make runs, but such is life
(so
Follow-up Comment #16, bug #63157 (project make):
Sorry I should have been more clear. When I said "non-regression changes" I
was specifically referring to the extra effort needed to get files to be
deleted on Windows, as in comment #11
That change is related to the temporary stdin file, not to
Here is a small patch to get the current make code compiled and running
on MSDOS/FreeDOS using DJGPP. I assume that for such minor changes no
paper work is required. Thank you for keep the DJGPP specific code available.
Regards,
Juan M. Guerrero
2022-10-12 Juan M. Guerrero
* build
On Wed, 2022-10-12 at 22:18 +0200, Juan Manuel Guerrero wrote:
> Here is a small patch to get the current make code compiled and
> running on MSDOS/FreeDOS using DJGPP. I assume that for such minor
> changes no paper work is required.
Correct. But, note that the FSF considers contributions cumul
Am Wed, 12 Oct 2022 16:50:40 -0400
schrieb Paul Smith :
> On Wed, 2022-10-12 at 22:18 +0200, Juan Manuel Guerrero wrote:
> > Here is a small patch to get the current make code compiled and
> > running on MSDOS/FreeDOS using DJGPP. I assume that for such minor
> > changes no paper work is required
On Wed, 2022-10-12 at 23:33 +0200, Juan Manuel Guerrero wrote:
> Sorry, I have noted that the patch has been malformed by the mail
> program so I submit the same a second time. Excuse the
> inconveniences.
It's small enough that I would just apply it by hand, but thanks for
sending an update, it'
