[bug #58734] gmake does not check for the existence of a file before complaining it is missing

2020-07-08 Thread Jörg Schilling
URL: Summary: gmake does not check for the existence of a file before complaining it is missing Project: make Submitted by: schily Submitted on: Wed 08 Jul 2020 02:59:25 PM UTC Severi

[bug #58735] if depending on include, gmake does not execute commands for out of date targets in the right order

2020-07-08 Thread Jörg Schilling
URL: Summary: if depending on include, gmake does not execute commands for out of date targets in the right order Project: make Submitted by: schily Submitted on: Wed 08 Jul 2020 03:10:27 PM UTC

[bug #58734] gmake does not check for the existence of a file before complaining it is missing

2020-07-08 Thread Dmitry Goncharov
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #58734 (project make): Can you please attach a makefile that demonstrates the issue? ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Сообщение

[bug #58735] if depending on include, gmake does not execute commands for out of date targets in the right order

2020-07-08 Thread Paul D. Smith
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #58735 (project make): I'm not sure I understand the issue being reported: an example would help. Make works by first reading the initial makefile(s) and all (existing) included files. During this step it doesn't complain about missing makefiles. Then after that is all

[bug #58734] gmake does not check for the existence of a file before complaining it is missing

2020-07-08 Thread Paul D. Smith
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #58734 (project make): > either the program is run twice This can only happen if parallel mode is enabled, and is the correct behavior assuming you've written your rule like this: one two: three ; touch one two This means the same thing as: one: three ; touch one t

[bug #58734] gmake does not check for the existence of a file before complaining it is missing

2020-07-08 Thread anonymous
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #58734 (project make): > directory caching ... which I was convinced was flawed in: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-make/2016-10/msg00019.html I bet that's not the problem here, but, until we see the example Dmitry requested... _