On 05/26/2013 05:18 AM, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
> (Sorry, I can't reply properly; I'm not subscribed, just saw the
> message on the web archive.)
>
> Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>
>> Make run in parallel mode with output redirected to a regular file
>> can randomly drop output lines
>
> Yet another
Update of bug #39035 (project make):
Status:None => Fixed
Assigned to:None => psmith
Open/Closed:Open => Closed
Operating System:
Update of bug #39028 (project make):
Item Group:None => Enhancement
Status:None => Fixed
Assigned to:None => psmith
Open/Closed:
Update of bug #38945 (project make):
Status:None => Fixed
Assigned to:None => psmith
Open/Closed:Open => Closed
Fixed Release:
On Sun, 2013-05-26 at 11:14 +0200, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> Actually no; maybe it is *possible* to play some tricks with the
> inherited file descriptors in order to mitigate or fix the issue,
> but I haven't given it any real thought.
Well, we can use fcntl() to set O_APPEND on stdout/stderr.
On 05/26/2013 09:57 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
>
> [SNIP]
>
> Might be worthwhile checking the FreeBSD code for their make, to see if
> they do something like this.
>
Nope, Frank was right: when run in parallel mode, FreeBSD make unconditionally
behaves like GNU make does with the '-O' option enabled (
On Sun, 2013-05-26 at 22:05 +0200, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> On 05/26/2013 09:57 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
> >
> > [SNIP]
> >
> > Might be worthwhile checking the FreeBSD code for their make, to see if
> > they do something like this.
> >
> Nope, Frank was right: when run in parallel mode, FreeBSD ma
On 05/26/2013 10:20 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-05-26 at 22:05 +0200, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>> On 05/26/2013 09:57 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
>>>
>>> [SNIP]
>>>
>>> Might be worthwhile checking the FreeBSD code for their make, to see if
>>> they do something like this.
>>>
>> Nope, Frank was
Update of bug #38442 (project make):
Status:None => Fixed
Assigned to:None => psmith
Open/Closed:Open => Closed
Fixed Release:
On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 19:06 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > I still don't want to add back the pointer to the struct. Memory usage
> > by GNU make is becoming a sore spot, especially as larger and larger
> > build systems start to move to non-recursive make. If necessary we'll
> > need to make th
Paul Smith wrote:
> Nevertheless, I do wonder whether forcing stdout/stderr into O_APPEND
> mode would be worthwhile. It would fix this problem in any event. I'm
> having a hard time coming up with a reason NOT to do it.
One issue, though it might seem strange that I'm the one to mention
it, is
11 matches
Mail list logo