Re: [PATCH]: Continuing touching files after an error

2011-12-10 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 16:04 +0200, Atte Peltomäki wrote: > Hello, > > here's a small fix for a corner case I happened to run into. > > Scenario: > > Run 'make -t' on an incomplete tree, where a dependency file and > the subdirectory it should be in, are completely missing. Make fails > and e

Re: targets/SECONDARY TEST#9 fails sometimes

2011-12-10 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 11:53 -0800, Tim Newsome wrote: > Does anybody know what the right solution to this problem is? I'm > happy to implement/test either one, but I don't want to spend my time > working on a solution that won't be accepted upstream. I committed a fix for this. -- --

Re: [PATCH]: Continuing touching files after an error

2011-12-10 Thread Atte Peltomäki
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 12:17:14PM -0500, Paul Smith wrote: > On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 16:04 +0200, Atte Peltomäki wrote: > > Hello, > > > > here's a small fix for a corner case I happened to run into. > > > > Scenario: > > > > Run 'make -t' on an incomplete tree, where a dependency file and > >