On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 11:51 +0300, Thomas Backlund wrote:
> BOOT_TARGETS = zImage zImage.initrd uImage zImage% dtbImage%
> treeImage.% cuImage.% simpleImage.%
>
> Now, I dont know if this is "intended breakage" by the make update, or
> if the Makefile needs to be updated
The change is intent
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 15:42 -0700, tom honermann wrote:
> I am not seeking legal advice, comments about the legality or
> ethicality of such aggregated works, or comments regarding
> requirements of the GPL licenses. I'm looking for companies that are
> distributing such aggregated works as exampl
Update of bug #16362 (project make):
Status:None => Fixed
Assigned to:None => eliz
Open/Closed:Open => Closed
Fixed Release:
Update of bug #30662 (project make):
Status:None => Fixed
Assigned to:None => eliz
Open/Closed:Open => Closed
However, I do see some value in an extension to support command-line
options that would, whenever executing a recipe, output the make-file
name and line number, along with $@ and maybe $? (or at least its
first few entries) - for example --debug=r (recipe) might enable this;
this would fit with
> From: Juan Manuel Guerrero
> Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 20:24:58 +0200
>
> Here is a small patch to make "make" compile out-of-the-box with djgpp.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Juan M. Guerrero
>
>
>
>
> 2010-07-31 Juan Manuel Guerrero
>
> * configh.dos: Define HAVE_STRNCASECMP.
>
> * do
