On 3/3/2010 2:03 AM, Edward Welbourne wrote:
Another possibility crossed my mind over-night, with which I haven't
experimented, but that seems like it theoretically should work.
Replace the touch-file with a phony rule:
yacc.ts: grammar.y
yacc -d -v $^
y.tab.h y.tab.c y.output .
On 3/29/2010 2:18 PM, tom honermann wrote:
.INTERMEDIATE: yacc.ts
all: y.tab.h y.tab.c y.output y.tab.o
clean:
rm -f y.tab.h y.tab.c y.output y.tab.o
grammar.y:
@touch $@
yacc.ts: grammar.y
@echo "Running yacc..."
@sleep 1
On 3/2/2010 5:18 PM, tom honermann wrote:
On 3/2/2010 2:45 AM, Edward Welbourne wrote:
I've been struggling for some time now with how to write rules for
commands that generate multiple targets
A familiar and annoying problem: make really believes in commands that
generate just one (relevant)
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 7:54 PM, tom honermann wrote:
> Paul, would you be opposed to a patch that implements support for static
> multiple target rules using the above syntax?
> Any particular concerns or requirements you would have?
...
> a1 (b1 b2 b3): d1
> touch -r $^ $@
>
> Note the s
