> The only downsides to this I see are:
>
> 1: The duplicate file storage. Probably not a big deal.
> 2: The extra processing time to archive and extract the files. Again,
> probably not a big deal.
> 3: The "why'd they do that?" questions coming from people unfamiliar
> with the technique.
al
Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> > Both of you have confirmed the bug - because the correct behaviour has
> > no error messages, and you both got messages. Neither of you was able
> > to reproduce getting a text-dependent number of messages, but both
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 19:48 +, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> > As a side note, I don't understand why you call this a bug in
> > $(eval)...as it's completely reproducible without using $(eval)! Did
> > you try testing it directly? If not, why not?
>
> The full bug is not reproducible (by me) without
