> From: Paul Smith
> Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 02:01:03 -0400
> Cc: bug-make@gnu.org
> Reply-To: psm...@gnu.org
>
> Less obvious is which of the various ways it could be fixed is the right
> way. Should we stop "cleaning" these paths altogether, to work around
> the bug in glibc glob()? I think if
On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 04:09 -0400, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Might as well bring some glibc expert on board for this discussion.
> (Sorry, I don't have a recommendation who might that be.) They could
> put the glibc behavior into perspective, and also advise about other
> implementations of `glob'.
Update of bug #15919 (project make):
Status:None => Fixed
Open/Closed:Open => Closed
___
Follow-up Comment #30:
I debugged this and
Update of bug #25703 (project make):
Item Group: Bug => Enhancement
___
Follow-up Comment #1:
I'm marking this as an enhancement, since the code works as designed. I
agree it would be nice to
Update of bug #22010 (project make):
Status:None => Fixed
Assigned to:None => psmith
Open/Closed:Open => Closed
Fixed Release:
Update of bug #22434 (project make):
Status:None => Not A Bug
Open/Closed:Open => Closed
___
Follow-up Comment #6:
This problem is happe
Update of bug #22442 (project make):
Status:None => Not A Bug
Open/Closed:Open => Closed
___
Follow-up Comment #2:
Closing. Feel free t
Update of bug #23361 (project make):
Status:None => Not A Bug
Open/Closed:Open => Closed
___
Follow-up Comment #2:
Dave's comment is cor
Update of bug #23210 (project make):
Status:None => Not A Bug
Open/Closed:Open => Closed
___
Follow-up Comment #3:
The problem is that t
Update of bug #21854 (project make):
Status:None => Fixed
Open/Closed:Open => Closed
Fixed Release:None => CVS
Update of bug #21823 (project make):
Status:None => Fixed
Assigned to:None => psmith
Open/Closed:Open => Closed
Fixed Release:
11 matches
Mail list logo