Hi all;
I'm considering switching from CVS to another form of SCM. Currently,
Savannah supports (in addition to CVS) GNU arch and GIT. If SVN were
supported I'd probably go for that, because (a) it has great support for
alternative OSs like Windows, etc.; and (b) GNU make development is
currentl
On Oct 13, 2007, at 6:37 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
Hi all;
I'm considering switching from CVS to another form of SCM. Currently,
Savannah supports (in addition to CVS) GNU arch and GIT.
[...]
I don't really know what the current state-of-the-art is WRT GIT on
non-POSIX systems, so... please give
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 12:37:46PM -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
>Hi all;
>
>I'm considering switching from CVS to another form of SCM. Currently,
>Savannah supports (in addition to CVS) GNU arch and GIT. If SVN were
>supported I'd probably go for that, because (a) it has great support for
>alternativ
> Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 13:59:43 -0400
> From: Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc:
>
> Isn't there a pure MinGW (not msys) version too?
If someone knows where to get it, please tell.
___
Bug-make mailing list
Bug-make@gnu.org
http://lists.g
> From: Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 12:37:46 -0400
> Cc:
>
> I'm considering switching from CVS to another form of SCM.
Can you tell why?
___
Bug-make mailing list
Bug-make@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug
> From: Benoit SIGOURE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 19:18:42 +0200
> Cc: Make Windows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, bug-make
>
> I frequently read Git's ML and it seems rather stable on Cygwin.
Which for me is a turn-off, because I don't want to install Cygwin.
> The MSYS version should
> From: Benoit SIGOURE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 20:52:58 +0200
> Cc: bug-make
>
> On Oct 13, 2007, at 7:59 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> > Isn't there a pure MinGW (not msys) version too?
> >
>
> This sounds unlikely because many commands in git-core are shell
> script
On 10/13/07, Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems like GIT is where the mindshare is these days, plus a number of
> the other autotools projects have already migrated (or are in the middle
> of migrating) to GIT, so that's what I'd go with.
> please give me your opinions on this change
On Oct 13, 2007, at 7:59 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Isn't there a pure MinGW (not msys) version too?
This sounds unlikely because many commands in git-core are shell
scripts (or sometimes Perl scripts) written on top of plumbing commands.
But with the librarification of Git, it will pr
On Oct 13, 2007, at 9:12 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
From: Benoit SIGOURE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 19:18:42 +0200
Cc: Make Windows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, bug-make
I frequently read Git's ML and it seems rather stable on Cygwin.
Which for me is a turn-off, because I don't want to
In my opinion, distributed control version systems like GIT or
Mercurial are the way to go in the long term. In Sun all the
repositories are (or are being migrated to) Mercurial.
There is only one serious limitation with GIT: each developer must
have a complete repository, that is, it is not posib
> Cc: Make Windows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> bug-make
> From: Benoit SIGOURE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:09:56 +0200
>
> > Is there a good native Windows port of GIT?
>
> http://git.or.cz/gitwiki/WindowsInstall
Thanks, I already found that page. However, it sounds like it onl
12 matches
Mail list logo
