[bug #102] Make prints an incorrect error for missing includes

2006-08-30 Thread Atte Kojo
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #102 (project make): This isn't exactly the same thing, but related, and a bona fide bug in include resolution. Our environment uses one local (as in ./) included makefile that contains, among other things, necessary defintions for finding other included makefiles (that

Re: filenames with colons in them

2006-08-30 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:50:58 +0800 > > P.S., in the Info index, lines with :: are unchoosable: > byte-code: No such node or anchor: rule, double-colon ( Please give an example of such an index entry in the Make manual (or any other manual).

Re: make 3.60: BS/NL mishandled with non-default SHELL

2006-08-30 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 16:07:37 +0200 > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > The following makefile causes a syntax error, but works correctly when the > first line is commented out. Did you really mean "make 3.60"? _

[bug #17572] Using Windows pathnames fail

2006-08-30 Thread anonymous
URL: Summary: Using Windows pathnames fail Project: make Submitted by: None Submitted on: Wednesday 08/30/2006 at 14:23 UTC Severity: 3 - Normal Item Group: Bug

Re: make 3.60: BS/NL mishandled with non-default SHELL

2006-08-30 Thread Andreas Schwab
Eli Zaretskii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> From: Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 16:07:37 +0200 >> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> The following makefile causes a syntax error, but works correctly when the >> first line is commented out. > > Did you really mean "make 3.

[bug #17572] Using Windows pathnames fail

2006-08-30 Thread Eli Zaretskii
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #17572 (project make): I cannot reproduce this with a native Windows build of Make 3.81. I get the expected message: make: *** No rule to make target `C:/Folder', needed by `target.o'. Stop. What port of Make did you use, and where did you get the binary? If you you

[bug #102] Make prints an incorrect error for missing includes

2006-08-30 Thread Paul D. Smith
Follow-up Comment #5, bug #102 (project make): Re: Comment #3: > All is well. So why the error? Yes, this is exactly the bug. The problem is that make generates the error before it realizes that it could rebuild the target. I've tried on a couple of occassions to fix this by delaying the error