On Tue, 2022-11-01 at 22:51 +0100, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
> That's why I only suggested a warning since it may be un expected
> (especially with ".WAIT") or unintended (even in your example at the
> end, why would one put "pause" twice intentionally).
I see. We can't do this; there are tons of w
Paul Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-11-01 at 14:15 +0100, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
> > So "pause" is run only once. Now, I suppose that's as it's supposed
> > to be (by comparison with the same rule without ".WAIT"), and I
> > don't expect you to change anything about it, so that's basically
> > just
On Tue, 2022-11-01 at 14:15 +0100, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
> So "pause" is run only once. Now, I suppose that's as it's supposed
> to be (by comparison with the same rule without ".WAIT"), and I
> don't expect you to change anything about it, so that's basically
> just for information to anyone who
