On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 15:42 -0700, tom honermann wrote:
> I am not seeking legal advice, comments about the legality or
> ethicality of such aggregated works, or comments regarding
> requirements of the GPL licenses. I'm looking for companies that are
> distributing such aggregated works as exampl
On 8/4/2010 2:26 PM, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 12:27 PM, tom honermann wrote:
On 8/4/2010 11:25 AM, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
There are free software license that are not GPL, for example the
modified BSD license. Pointing you to non-free software would be
wrong, sin
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 12:27 PM, tom honermann wrote:
> On 8/4/2010 11:25 AM, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>> There are free software license that are not GPL, for example the
>> modified BSD license. Pointing you to non-free software would be
>> wrong, since such software subjugates your rights as a
On 8/4/2010 11:25 AM, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
There are free software license that are not GPL, for example the
modified BSD license. Pointing you to non-free software would be
wrong, since such software subjugates your rights as a computer user.
Ah, yes, if only the world were that simple.
I'm interested in finding some examples of proprietary software
products (ie, non-GPL licensed) that distribute a copy of GNU make
(preferably a binary, with or without changes to the GNU make
source code) with the product. If you are aware of such a product,
I would appreciate a re
