[bug #27381] wildcard function acts differently than in 3.81

Update of bug #27381 (project make): Status:None => Not A Bug Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #4: It doesn't look like

[bug #27381] wildcard function acts differently than in 3.81

Follow-up Comment #3, bug #27381 (project make): Thanks for the explanation. I would like to know if the NOSORT is needed to workaround a bug. Adding $(sort ...) is an acceptable workaround for my wildcards that needs sorting. ___ Reply

[bug #27381] wildcard function acts differently than in 3.81

Follow-up Comment #2, bug #27381 (project make): The change to use GLOB_NOCHECK was made to work around a bug. I can't tell from the ChangeLog (or my memory) whether GLOB_NOSORT was also required as part of that or not. If not, it was probably done to increase efficiency; many of the uses of wi

[bug #27381] wildcard function acts differently than in 3.81

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #27381 (project make): sorry, it submitted by accident. wildcard in 3.81 always came back as a sorted list. in CVS, it was changed to use GLOB_NOSORT. This causes wildcard to not return a sorted list. This changes the behavior of wildcard. Is there a reason not to sor

[bug #27381] wildcard function acts differently than in 3.81

URL: Summary: wildcard function acts differently than in 3.81 Project: make Submitted by: mtrinh Submitted on: Fri 04 Sep 2009 05:09:17 PM GMT Severity: 3 - Normal Item