On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 10:53 AM Edward Welbourne wrote:
>> I note that your implementation only supports numeric lhs and rhs.
>> Might it be worth falling back, if either of them isn't numeric, to
>> doing a strcmp() comparison instead ? Possibly after stripping
>> leading space from each. There
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 10:53 AM Edward Welbourne wrote:
>
> Jouke Witteveen (8 June 2020 22:20)
> > It differs from his original proposal in that it behaves differently
> > when given 4 or 5 arguments. In short, it's signature is
> >
> > $(compare lhs,rhs,less-than[,greater-or-equal])
> > $(comp
Jouke Witteveen (8 June 2020 22:20)
> This is an implementation of a $(compare) function as proposed by
> Edward Welbourne.
Yay ;^>
Looks promising in general.
As ever, review consists mostly of criticism, so let me just say I
approve of the general plan, before I start in on that ...
> It differ
This is an implementation of a $(compare) function as proposed by
Edward Welbourne. It differs from his original proposal in that it behaves
differently when given 4 or 5 arguments. In short, it's signature is
$(compare lhs,rhs,less-than[,greater-or-equal])
$(compare lhs,rhs,less-than,equal,gr
