Am Mittwoch, den 03.03.2021, 15:41 -0500 schrieb Paul Smith:
> If by "a feature like that" you mean a way to create multiple pattern
> rules with a single rule definition in the makefile, then obviously
> this would require some new syntax but assuming that syntax existed I
> don't see why it would
Maybe I was wrong to call this a bug but would a feature like that
break anything?
Am Mittwoch, den 03.03.2021, 13:55 -0500 schrieb Paul Smith:
> On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 17:31 +0100, Goran V. wrote:
> > $(BUILD)/$(FRONTEND)/%.html \
> > $(BUILD)/$(FRONTEND)/%.js \
> > $(BUI
I wrote a makefile with
$(BUILD)/$(FRONTEND)/%.html \
$(BUILD)/$(FRONTEND)/%.js \
$(BUILD)/$(FRONTEND)/%.css \
$(BUILD)/$(FRONTEND)/%.svg \
$(BUILD)/$(FRONTEND)/%.ico:
@echo -n "$(FRONTEND) - building $@"
@$(MD) $(BUILD)/$(FRONTEND)
@cp $(FRONTEND)/$(@F) $@
@ech
