Re: [RFC PATCH v4 0/3] per-target .ONESHELL with shard recipe fix

2024-12-26 Thread Britton Kerin
On Thu, Dec 26, 2024 at 10:37 AM David A. Wheeler wrote: > > > On Dec 23, 2024, at 7:56 PM, Britton Leo Kerin > > wrote: > > > > Another crack at per-target .ONESHELL. > > > > The major problem with v3 was that the shared struct commands for > > implicit rules, .DEFAULT rules suffix rules etc. c

Re: [RFC PATCH v4 0/3] per-target .ONESHELL with shard recipe fix

2024-12-26 Thread David A. Wheeler
> On Dec 23, 2024, at 7:56 PM, Britton Leo Kerin > wrote: > > Another crack at per-target .ONESHELL. > > The major problem with v3 was that the shared struct commands for > implicit rules, .DEFAULT rules suffix rules etc. caused use of .ONESHELL > with any target covered by such a rules to "

Re: [PATCH] Add arithmetic builtin functions

2024-12-26 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2024-12-09 at 17:18 -0800, Pete Dietl wrote: > Here is a bit of test code I came up with. Do you think this is > necessary and or the right approach for testing with extreme values > of double and long long? I think the idea of setting values in config-flags.pm.in is correct, just to keep