Re: [PATCH] Add arithmetic builtin functions

2024-12-19 Thread Pete Dietl
* Poke * On Mon, Dec 9, 2024, 5:18 PM Pete Dietl wrote: > I could also use some help with autotools and the Perl test scripts < > I am a novice at both :) > > > Here is a bit of test code I came up with. Do you think this is > necessary and or the right approach for testing with extreme values o

POSIX question on implicit .o rules

2024-12-19 Thread Eric Blake
Hello Paul and GNU make developers, The Austin Group (the people in charge of the POSIX specification) recently discussed this bug, and desire feedback from the GNU make community: https://www.austingroupbugs.net/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=1890 With GNU make 4.4.1 (and no makefile): $ touch foo.c

Re: POSIX question on implicit .o rules

2024-12-19 Thread Paul Smith
On Thu, 2024-12-19 at 14:08 -0500, Paul Smith wrote: > Technically, make's built-in recipe for .c.o is: Of course here I mean GNU Make, not POSIX make :-/.

Re: POSIX question on implicit .o rules

2024-12-19 Thread Paul Smith
On Thu, 2024-12-19 at 12:17 -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > Currently GNU make does not conform to the required .c.o inference > rule because it adds a -o option. Technically, make's built-in recipe for .c.o is: $(COMPILE.c) $(OUTPUT_OPTION) $< where OUTPUT_OPTION is set to "-o $@" if GNU Make's co