On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Eric Melski wrote:
> ElectricAccelerator is a gmake replacement that does exactly this. I wrote
> about this feature a while back:
>
> http://blog.electric-cloud.com/2008/12/01/untangling-parallel-build-logs/
>
> You can read more about Accelerator on the blog, or
Chiheng Xu wrote:
What I want is transparent "parallel make". Make can issue multiple
shells simultaneously, but print their outputs in the same order as in
a serial make.
ElectricAccelerator is a gmake replacement that does exactly this. I
wrote about this feature a while back:
http://bl
Chiheng Xu wrote:
What I want is transparent "parallel make". Make can issue multiple
shells simultaneously, but print their outputs in the same order as in
a serial make.
ElectricAccelerator is a gmake replacement that does exactly this. I
wrote about this feature a while back:
http://bl
> Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 07:51:22 +0100
> From: Tim Murphy
> Cc: e...@opera.com, bug-make@gnu.org
>
> mytarget:
> ->command1 &&
> ->command2 &&
> ->command3
>
>
> Note that I'm using bash syntax here. On windows if you want to use
> cmd.exe then good luck - I don't think it's really fit for pur
Chiheng Xu wrote:
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Tim Murphy wrote:
Since some things happen at the same time there is no single "serial
order". The semaphore mechanism, forces one of the possible orders.
I'm not familiar with source code of make, but I believe the "serial
order" of shells
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Tim Murphy wrote:
>
> Since some things happen at the same time there is no single "serial
> order". The semaphore mechanism, forces one of the possible orders.
>
I'm not familiar with source code of make, but I believe the "serial
order" of shells is determined b
