%% "Howard Chu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
hc> You just answered your own question: "b" & "c" depend on "a", so make "a"
hc> a dependency for "b" & "c":
Right, what Howard said; I got it backwards in my message :(.
--
---
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> John Alvord
>
> I've been working to rework some makefiles to they work correctly
> under parallel execution conditions.
>
> all: a b c
>
> a:
>
> b:
>
> c:
>
> Lets say "a" is a rule which creates some
%% [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Alvord) writes:
ja> I've been working to rework some makefiles to they work correctly
ja> under parallel execution conditions.
ja> all: a b c
ja> a:
ja> b:
ja> c:
ja> Lets say "a" is a rule which creates some directories which are used
ja> by "b" an
I've been working to rework some makefiles to they work correctly
under parallel execution conditions.
all: a b c
a:
b:
c:
Lets say "a" is a rule which creates some directories which are used
by "b" and "c". How can I make sure that "b" and "c" are postponed
until "a" completes?
john alvord
