Re: make check failure on HPUX-11.23 and HPUX-11.31

2013-03-11 Thread Eric Blake
On 03/10/2013 09:19 PM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: > Hi Eric, > > I don't really understand the nuances of this test enough to debug > any further. It looks like the expectations are too tight by > requiring an error rather than a silent failure. WDYT? > > ... > hpux% echo nothing | ./src/m4 >&- >

Re: make check failure on HPUX-11.23 and HPUX-11.31

2013-03-11 Thread Gary V. Vaughan
Hi Eric, On 11 Mar 2013, at 19:54, Eric Blake wrote: > On 03/10/2013 09:19 PM, Gary V. Vaughan wrote: >> I don't really understand the nuances of this test enough to debug >> any further. It looks like the expectations are too tight by >> requiring an error rather than a silent failure. WDYT? >

Re: large diversions broken on mingw

2013-03-11 Thread Eric Blake
On 03/09/2013 04:09 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 03/09/2013 08:12 AM, Eric Blake wrote: >> Just a heads up that I'm trying to fix a bug in diversion handling, >> exposed by 'make check', but which only shows on mingw or other >> platforms where rename() can't change the name of an open file. Most >>