Re: bug in autoconf-2.64

2011-02-24 Thread Jim Meyering
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > [ this is http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.bugs/7834 > from http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-02/msg01480.html > adding bug-gnulib; followups can elide bug-autoconf ] > > * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 07:24:35AM CET: >> IOW, i

Re: bug in autoconf-2.64

2011-02-24 Thread Jim Meyering
Jim Meyering wrote: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > >> [ this is http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.bugs/7834 >> from http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-02/msg01480.html >> adding bug-gnulib; followups can elide bug-autoconf ] >> >> * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Thu, Feb 24, 2011

Re: bug in autoconf-2.64

2011-02-24 Thread Jim Meyering
Jim Meyering wrote: > Jim Meyering wrote: > >> Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >> >>> [ this is http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.bugs/7834 >>> from http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-02/msg01480.html >>> adding bug-gnulib; followups can elide bug-autoconf ] >>> >>> * Ralf Wildenh

Re: bug in autoconf-2.64

2011-02-24 Thread Jim Meyering
FYI, Here's a much-reduced test case for the short-needle case: const char *needle = ".d."; const char *haystack = "..d."; const char* p = strstr (haystack, needle); ASSERT (p && p - haystack == 1); Interestingly, it doesn't trigger a failure in glibc's slightly different impleme