Eric Blake wrote:
> In looking at this further, it looks like line 4179 of vasnprintf.c should
> _not_ count precision as a prefix if prec_ourselves is nonzero.
Yes. Now that you say it, it's obvious that the code in line 4179 should be
in sync with the code in line 4077.
> Without the patch to v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Bruno Haible on 9/2/2008 4:50 AM:
>>
>> OK to apply? Are there other files in lib or tests that need matching
>> modifications?
>
> Yes, please apply. 4 test files should be modified in sync:
>
> $ grep -rl 4000d tests/
> tests/test-snp
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 02:48:20PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> Shoot. I got the logic backwards. We want the test to exit with non-zero
> status if c_stack_action fails (returns non-zero), or if recurse returns
> (which should be impossible). The conditional should be written with ||,
> not &&.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Tom G. Christensen on 9/2/2008 9:28 AM:
>> So, with my typo fixed, can you once again try those debugging steps, to
>> see if the breakpoint in overflow_handler trips?
>>
> It does not.
Which means I think we have isolated the bug to the
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 01:20:43PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> I wonder if switching to libsigsegv's version will solve it. In the
> meantime, I would be curious to see the disassembly of recurse, to see if
> anything obvious appears as to why p==0 rather than a valid stack address
> before the fin
