Re: m4 1.4.11 test failures

2008-04-13 Thread Elbert Pol
Hoi Eric, I downloaded and run it, and yes it fails on the check. I attach the logs :P Eric Blake wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Elbert Pol on 4/12/2008 2:37 PM: | | Hi Eric, | | Says the url is not availble Sorry about that. I uploaded the .bz2 earlier but

Re: m4 1.4.11 test failures

2008-04-13 Thread Bruno Haible
Elbert Pol wrote: > I attach the logs :P Thanks, this is helpful again. > test-binary-io.c: In function `main': > test-binary-io.c:62: warning: implicit declaration of function `setmode' Fixing this warning through the patch below. > Killed by SIGFPE > FAIL: test-frexp.exe > > Killed by SIGFPE

Re: [m4-1.4.11] build feedback

2008-04-13 Thread Bruno Haible
Tom G. Christensen wrote: > I see the same test failure when building m4-1.4.11 on Irix 5.3 and 6.2 > regardless of compiler used. > > Irix 6.2 with MIPSpro 7.3.0 or GCC 4.3.0 (Indigo2 R10K): > test-vasprintf-posix.c:1309: assertion failed > /bin/ksh[9]: 10221 Abort(coredump) > FAIL: test-vasprint

Re: [m4-1.4.11] build feedback

2008-04-13 Thread Tom G. Christensen
Bruno Haible wrote: Eric Blake wrote, citing Nelson Beebe: | | Machinetype:SGI O2 R1-SC (150 MHz);IRIX 6.5 | Configure environment: CC=c89 CXX=CC CFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include CXXFLAGS=-I/usr/local/includ

Re: [m4-1.4.11] build feedback

2008-04-13 Thread Tom G. Christensen
Bruno Haible wrote: Tom G. Christensen wrote: I see the same test failure when building m4-1.4.11 on Irix 5.3 and 6.2 regardless of compiler used. Irix 6.2 with MIPSpro 7.3.0 or GCC 4.3.0 (Indigo2 R10K): test-vasprintf-posix.c:1309: assertion failed /bin/ksh[9]: 10221 Abort(coredump) FAIL: test

Re: [m4-1.4.11] build feedback

2008-04-13 Thread Bruno Haible
Tom G. Christensen wrote: > > - Does 1.0 / -0.0 < 0 evaluate to true or false? > > - Does 1.0L / -0.0L < 0 evaluate to true or false? > true > true Thanks. That's different from what I got on some IRIX 6.5 machine, but it's consistent with what you and Nelson see. > > - At test-vaspr

Re: [m4-1.4.11] build feedback

2008-04-13 Thread Tom G. Christensen
Bruno Haible wrote: Thanks, that's good so far. The interesting stuff is to look - what happens in line vasnprintf.c:2734, > Single stepping from test-vasprintf-posix:1305 does not seem to stop there (closest is 2531) - at the result in line vasnprintf.c:4635. > Single stepping indeed m

Re: [m4-1.4.11] build feedback

2008-04-13 Thread Bruno Haible
Tom G. Christensen wrote: > > Thanks, that's good so far. The interesting stuff is to look > > - what happens in line vasnprintf.c:2734, > > > Single stepping from test-vasprintf-posix:1305 does not seem to stop > there (closest is 2531) > > > - at the result in line vasnprintf.c:4635. > >