Re: snapshot in preparation for m4 1.4.12

2008-09-21 Thread Thomas Klausner
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 06:53:49AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > I'm committing this. It looks like your flavor of NetBSD now handles > denormals, but still fails on negative zero. I asked around a bit -- this was a regression. NetBSD has two versions of this code around, and recently switched back

Re: snapshot in preparation for m4 1.4.12

2008-09-12 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Thomas Klausner on 8/23/2008 10:11 AM: >>> When stepping through test-frexp with gdb, it fails like this: >>> (gdb) s >>> 113 ASSERT (signbit (mantissa)); >> Thanks for the trace. That occurs after the damage is already done; how

Re: snapshot in preparation for m4 1.4.12

2008-08-23 Thread Thomas Klausner
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 10:06:29AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > Expected; use './configure --enable-changeword' if you want that feature > enabled in m4, with the caveat that it will be withdrawn in m4 2.0 (in > favor of a more powerful and faster changesyntax feature). Ok, I'll leave it disabled th

Re: snapshot in preparation for m4 1.4.12

2008-08-23 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Thomas Klausner on 8/23/2008 9:54 AM: > Hi again! > > > Btw, did I mention last time that m4 tests work, but skip a few? > > Skipped checks were: > ./114.changeword ./115.changeword ./116.changeword ./117.changeword > ./118.chan > ge

Re: snapshot in preparation for m4 1.4.12

2008-08-23 Thread Thomas Klausner
Hi again! Btw, did I mention last time that m4 tests work, but skip a few? Skipped checks were: ./114.changeword ./115.changeword ./116.changeword ./117.changeword ./118.chan geword ./119.changeword All checks successful > According to Thomas Klausner on 8/14/2008 1:21 PM: > > One failure on

Re: snapshot in preparation for m4 1.4.12

2008-08-19 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Thomas Klausner on 8/14/2008 1:21 PM: > One failure on NetBSD-4.99.72/amd64: > test-frexp.c:113: assertion failed > [1] Abort trap (core dumped) EXEEXT="" EXEEXT... > FAIL: test-frexp Thanks for the report. Are you able to help us fix

Re: snapshot in preparation for m4 1.4.12

2008-08-14 Thread Thomas Klausner
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 07:37:47AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > I have released a new snapshot from branch-1.4, and hope to release it as > M4 1.4.12 in the near future. This should fix many of the complaints > about strtod and other test failures that were reported against 1.4.11. > However, it als

Re: snapshot in preparation for m4 1.4.12

2008-08-13 Thread Tom G. Christensen
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 06:05:53AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > According to Tom G. Christensen on 8/9/2008 6:41 AM: > > Hello Tom, > > | > | On Irix 6.5.30 I see gnulib test failures: > | ./test-c-stack.sh[7]: 12954353 Memory fault(coredump) > | FAIL: test-c-stack.sh > | FAIL: test-c-stack2.sh >

Re: snapshot in preparation for m4 1.4.12

2008-08-13 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Tom G. Christensen on 8/9/2008 6:41 AM: Hello Tom, Thanks for the report, and sorry for my delay in responding, | | On Irix 6.5.30 I see gnulib test failures: | ./test-c-stack.sh[7]: 12954353 Memory fault(coredump) | FAIL: test-c-stack

Re: snapshot in preparation for m4 1.4.12

2008-08-12 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Rick Genter on 8/12/2008 8:23 AM: | Eric, | | Running the tests using 'make -k check' results in the attached log. Two | tests fail: test-fseeko.sh and test-ftello.sh. Thanks for the report. Which platform is this on? There are various

Re: snapshot in preparation for m4 1.4.12

2008-08-12 Thread Rick Genter
Eric, Running the tests using 'make -k check' results in the attached log. Two tests fail: test-fseeko.sh and test-ftello.sh. m4-test-failure.log Description: Binary data Rick -- Rick Genter [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: snapshot in preparation for m4 1.4.12

2008-08-09 Thread Tom G. Christensen
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 07:37:47AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > Therefore I would appreciate some feedback > before making the 1.4.12 release (if you encounter a testsuite failure in > the m4 suite, please rerun with 'make -k check' before reporting it, so > that the gnulib testsuite is also run). >

Re: snapshot in preparation for m4 1.4.12

2008-08-08 Thread Alain Guibert
Hello Eric, Bruno, gentlemen, On Thursday, August 7, 2008 at 7:37:47 -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > I would appreciate some feedback before making the 1.4.12 release With pleasure. My environment: old Linux box (Intel Pentium 200 MMX, Debian bo, kernel 2.0.40, gcc 2.7.2.1, libc 5.4.33, GNU ld cygnu

Re: snapshot in preparation for m4 1.4.12

2008-08-07 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Eric, * Eric Blake wrote on Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 03:37:47PM CEST: > Therefore I would appreciate some feedback before making the 1.4.12 > release (if you encounter a testsuite failure in the m4 suite, please > rerun with 'make -k check' before reporting it, so that the gnulib > testsuite is als

Re: snapshot in preparation for m4 1.4.12

2008-08-07 Thread Elbert Pol
Hello Eric, I run the M4 and the ./configure and make runs fine. But with the make -k check there are some errors. I attach the check.log This is with os/2 Thankz for all :) check.out.lzma Description: Binary data