On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 10:59 PM, Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> According to Dennis Clarke on 7/30/2008 9:17 AM:
> |> Somehow, the test needs to be made more robust; we either need more m4
> |> magic to determine if -lm is necessary for
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 2:59 AM, Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> According to Dennis Clarke on 7/30/2008 9:17 AM:
> |> Somehow, the test needs to be made more robust; we either need more m4
> |> magic to determine if -lm is necessary for f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Dennis Clarke on 7/30/2008 9:17 AM:
|> Somehow, the test needs to be made more robust; we either need more m4
|> magic to determine if -lm is necessary for fabs, or a gnulib replacement
|> for fabs that works without requiring libm, or a
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 4:26 AM, Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> [re-adding the list, and also adding bug-gnulib, since this particular
> problem is related to gnulib. For bug-gnulib readers: this is a report of
> test-strtod failure on S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[re-adding the list, and also adding bug-gnulib, since this particular
problem is related to gnulib. For bug-gnulib readers: this is a report of
test-strtod failure on Solaris 10]
According to Dennis Clarke on 7/29/2008 10:09 PM:
| whoops
|
| builds
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 2:22 AM, Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> According to Dennis Clarke on 7/29/2008 7:48 PM:
> | not too sure what the issue is here.
>
> | test-strtod.c:738: assertion failed
> ...
> | FAIL: test-strtod
>
> The issue
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Dennis Clarke on 7/29/2008 7:48 PM:
| not too sure what the issue is here.
| test-strtod.c:738: assertion failed
...
| FAIL: test-strtod
The issue is well-known. Your libc is buggy when it comes to C99
strtod(3) compliance, but the con
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Jean-Michel Beuken on 7/19/2008 8:44 AM:
| Hello,
|
| - CentOS release 5.2 (Final)
| - Dual-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2220 - gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20071124
| (Red Hat 4.1.2-42)
| - m4-1.4.11
Known bug in your glibc, and not in m4.
http:/
