Re: Disappearing barlines with skipBars - possible bug?

2015-03-24 Thread Mark Knoop
At 12:31 on 24 Mar 2015, Kevin Barry wrote: >On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Mark Knoop wrote: >>>>At 18:16 on 23 Mar 2015, Mark Knoop wrote: >>>Barlines disappear when skipBars is true and a note duration >>>continues over the bar. I don't think this

Re: Disappearing barlines with skipBars - possible bug?

2015-03-24 Thread Mark Knoop
At 15:43 on 24 Mar 2015, Kevin Barry wrote: >On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Mark Knoop wrote: > >> { \time 2/4 c'4 c'1 c'4 } % 3 bars, 2nd of which is empty >> >> { \time 2/4 c'4 c'2 c'4 } % 2 bars, neither of which is empty >> >

Re: Disappearing barlines with skipBars - possible bug?

2015-03-25 Thread Mark Knoop
strina taken from an edition which tries >transforming the original in sort of modern notation. That is an interesting case. It would seem to me that ideally there should be two properties (perhaps three?) to control this behaviour for notes, rests and multimeasure rests

Effect of <> empty chord on spacing

2015-05-09 Thread Mark Knoop
ched to R1 } c'1 \repeat unfold 16 c'16 } -- Mark Knoop ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

regression: point-and-click no longer includes absolute path

2016-05-13 Thread Mark Knoop
ys returns an absolute, slashified path Now is-absolute? is not used anymore by LilyPond itself. -- Mark Knoop ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Re: regression: point-and-click no longer includes absolute path

2016-05-17 Thread Mark Knoop
relative or absolute. >(and that what was the case when I made that change (and obviously >noone had objections then)). > >So please show me what you get in return from that function on your >system. Or an example where point-and-click links are actually >generated relatively and

Re: regression: point-and-click no longer includes absolute path

2016-05-17 Thread Mark Knoop
pdf now. >Indeed, this is right, so obviously my patch *did* change the behaviour >of point-and-click. (I have to repeat that nobody noticed that during >review). It could be that most point-and-click users are also users of Frescobaldi or other front-ends that pass the full path

Re: Changed behaviour of point-and-click

2016-05-17 Thread Mark Knoop
am wrong on this. -- Mark Knoop ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Re: Changed behaviour of point-and-click

2016-05-17 Thread Mark Knoop
At 10:32 on 17 May 2016, Urs Liska wrote: >Am 17.05.2016 um 14:30 schrieb Mark Knoop: >> At 05:47 on 17 May 2016, Urs Liska wrote: >>> Mark, can you give us a reason why you consider relative >>> point-and-click links "broken"? >> I am unaware of

Re: Changed behaviour of point-and-click

2016-06-02 Thread Mark Knoop
Sorry for the delayed reply - I've been travelling. See below. At 18:27 on 17 May 2016, David Kastrup wrote: >Mark Knoop writes: >> Could you indicate a working setup where relative point-and-click >> links are *not* broken? > >They work like other file-relative links

Re: segfault in 2.19.45

2016-07-29 Thread Mark Knoop
/cgit/lilypond.git/commit/?id=b0dce76daf27721ba157cd2ac5d7662d4c8d75f8 This is fixed in git, we just need to wait for a new build in Fedora. -- Mark Knoop ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Re: Crash: Unterminated tie with articulation in temporary voice

2016-09-09 Thread Mark Knoop
mpiles %fis'1 -> % compiles %fis'1 ~ -> fis'1 ~ % compiles %fis'1 ~ -> fis'1 ~ g' % compiles } -- Mark Knoop ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

clusters interrupted by rests but not multi-measure rests

2017-04-19 Thread Mark Knoop
't seem to be an issue for this in the tracker. Surely this is not the intended behaviour? \version "2.19.59" \makeClusters { \textLengthOn 2 r1^\markup "clusters stop for Rests" 2 <>^\markup "but not MultiMeasureRests" R1

tupletFullLength, tupletFullLengthNote problems

2008-04-23 Thread Mark Knoop
> I'm not top posting. 1) When tupletFullLength is set, combining tuplets with a clef change in another staff results in the tuplet bracket ending early. 2) When tupletFullLengthNote is set and a tuplet ends a line, the tuplet number is printed again at the beginning of the next line and the bra

Re: paper variables does not affect a score placed in a markup block

2018-12-16 Thread Mark Knoop
27;4 >} In markup, use baseline-skip instead, viz: \markup \override #'(baseline-skip . 5) \score {   \repeat unfold 120 c'4 } -- Mark Knoop ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Re: Rehearsal mark interferes with TupletBracket length

2019-02-20 Thread Mark Knoop
n prove this by adding an X-offset to the > RehearsalMark and the issue goes away. I can't test this at the moment, but are you anywhere overriding the `extra-spacing-width` of the RehearsalMark grob? -- Mark Knoop ___ bug-lilypond maili

bendAfter broken by chords

2019-07-15 Thread Mark Knoop
er #-5 ^"bend fails even if chord is in another voice" } \context Voice { \voiceTwo } >> \oneVoice } % -- Mark Knoop m...@markknoop.com https://markknoop.com/ ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Re: quoteDuring and repeat tremolo don't work together

2020-03-21 Thread Mark Knoop
/writing-parts#quoting-other-voices -- Mark Knoop ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Re: quoteDuring and repeat tremolo don't work together

2020-03-21 Thread Mark Knoop
At 15:10 on 21 Mar 2020, David Kastrup wrote: > Mark Knoop writes: >> At 12:52 on 21 Mar 2020, Rutger Hofman wrote: >>> Good morning list, >>> >>> when I end a \quoteDuring after a \repeat tremolo { ... }, the tremolo >>> beams are missing or dis

Re: Full bar rest printed incorrectly after time signature change

2022-10-28 Thread Mark Knoop
g from Lilypond: "mid-measure time > signature without \partial". Hi Ole, I'm not sure why you think the NR says to use "\partial 8*0", but the following should work for your CPE Bach example. { \time 3/4 \partial 4 c'4 | c'4 4 4 | 4

Re: Breath mark style in LilyPond 2.23.80

2022-11-12 Thread Mark Knoop
k there as well. Sorry for the long > text... and yes, I'm still shocked (and sticking with older versions > for now). Search for \breathe on this page. https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.23/Documentation/changes/index.html Perhaps the user list m

Re: 2.22: unexpected bar numbering when using * lengths and skipBars

2022-11-21 Thread Mark Knoop
evious event if not explicitly specified. This includes the duration of multimeasure rests. You have already found the solution - this is the expected behaviour. -- Mark Knoop ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Re: Automatic barline misplaced?

2022-11-23 Thread Mark Knoop
. There should be 8 quavers before the *first* barline, not 5, so try this: \relative c' { \clef treble \key ees \major \time 12/8 \tempo "Tempo molto moderato" \partial 8*8 bes4~\p\<( bes2.~ | bes4 ees8 f) bes4-- g-- ees8 f4.\fermata } (This is not a lilypo