Faulty extra beam with manual beam and cross-staff stems

2023-08-01 Thread Ole V. Villumsen via bug-lilypond
% Manual beams and cross-staff stems don’t seem to work together. % Expected result: Shared stems across staves; beams above notes in upper staff only. % I have tried all possible combinations of specifying beams and \crossStaff in the % upper staff, the lower one and both. I always get unwanted

Re: Faulty extra beam with manual beam and cross-staff stems

2023-08-01 Thread Jean Abou Samra
Le mardi 01 août 2023 à 18:34 +, Ole V. Villumsen via bug-lilypond a écrit : > % Manual beams and cross-staff stems don’t seem to work together. > % Expected result: Shared stems across staves; beams above notes in upper > staff only. > > % I have tried all possible combinations of specifying

Re: Faulty extra beam with manual beam and cross-staff stems

2023-08-01 Thread Ole V. Villumsen via bug-lilypond
Hi Jean, indeed. I retract my bug report. Your solution works in the case where I specify \crossStaff in the lower staff (or both) and, as you say, the manual beams only in the upper staff. And no, this is pretty far from perfect and could also benefit from being made clear in the NR. Cheers, Ole

Re: Faulty extra beam with manual beam and cross-staff stems

2023-08-01 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> And no, this is pretty far from perfect and could also benefit from > being made clear in the NR. What do you want to have where exactly? Werner

Re: Faulty extra beam with manual beam and cross-staff stems

2023-08-01 Thread William Rehwinkel via bug-lilypond
I can see "\autoBeamOff" pretty clearly here, which was the first link found from googling "lilypond cross-staff stems" https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.25/Documentation/snippets/staff-notation_003a-cross-staff-stems -will On 8/1/23 15:22, Ole V. Villumsen via bug-lilypond wrote: Hi Jean, indeed.

Re: Faulty extra beam with manual beam and cross-staff stems

2023-08-01 Thread Ole V. Villumsen via bug-lilypond
Hi Will, Thanks for your question. My first wish would be to have cross-staff stems explained in the NR proper, not just in a snippet. Maybe it would fit somewhere under 2.2.1 Common notation for keyboards? The description would obviously best make the requirements clear in the text, not only i

Re: Faulty extra beam with manual beam and cross-staff stems

2023-08-01 Thread Jean Abou Samra
Le mardi 01 août 2023 à 20:35 +, Ole V. Villumsen a écrit : > Finally a warning message from Lilypond would be nice when I do it wrong so > that I don’t start suspecting a bug. Explanatory and with suggestion how to > fix if possible. If anybody is going to invest work into this, I think it w

convert-ly.py in 2.25.7 "broken"

2023-08-01 Thread Craig Fearing
If I use Frescobaldi's "Update..." tool, files with version numbers less than 2.25.6 get updated to 2.25.6 and those already at 2.25.6 are not touched. If I compare the convert-ly files in 2.25.5 and 2.25.6 I see they are almost identical except for version number.  That is not true, however,

Re: convert-ly.py in 2.25.7 "broken"

2023-08-01 Thread Jean Abou Samra
Le mardi 01 août 2023 à 23:36 +0200, Craig Fearing a écrit : > If I use Frescobaldi's "Update..." tool, files with version numbers less > than 2.25.6 get updated to 2.25.6 and those already at 2.25.6 are not > touched. > > If I compare the convert-ly files in 2.25.5 and 2.25.6 I see they are >