Re: glyph-path-regexp in SVG output is overly strict

2020-02-21 Thread pkx166h
Hello Simon, On 20/02/2020 18:33, Simon Tatham wrote: A user of my notation font Gonville reported to me this week that they had tried to use the Lilypond SVG backend with Gonville, and had found that everything worked fine except that the sharp signs were mysteriously missing from the output.

Re: glyph-path-regexp in SVG output is overly strict

2020-02-21 Thread Jonas Hahnfeld via bug-lilypond
Hi Simon, Am Freitag, den 21.02.2020, 09:29 + schrieb pkx1...@posteo.net: > Hello Simon, > > On 20/02/2020 18:33, Simon Tatham wrote: > > A user of my notation font Gonville reported to me this week that they > > had tried to use the Lilypond SVG backend with Gonville, and had found > > that

Re: glyph-path-regexp in SVG output is overly strict

2020-02-21 Thread Simon Tatham
Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > looking at https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5779/ and > the grammar you linked, I think the regular expression is also missing > '+Aa,'. Does it make sense to fuse attached patch? The idea looks sensible to me, but I think you've made a mistake in the regula

Re: glyph-path-regexp in SVG output is overly strict

2020-02-21 Thread pkx166h
Jonas On 21/02/2020 11:33, Simon Tatham wrote: Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: looking at https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5779/ and the grammar you linked, I think the regular expression is also missing '+Aa,'. Does it make sense to fuse attached patch? The idea looks sensible to me, bu

Re: glyph-path-regexp in SVG output is overly strict

2020-02-21 Thread Jonas Hahnfeld via bug-lilypond
Am Freitag, den 21.02.2020, 11:50 + schrieb pkx166h: > Jonas > > On 21/02/2020 11:33, Simon Tatham wrote: > > Jonas Hahnfeld < > > hah...@hahnjo.de > > > wrote: > > > looking at > > > https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5779/ > > > and > > > the grammar you linked, I think the re

Re: glyph-path-regexp in SVG output is overly strict

2020-02-21 Thread Jonas Hahnfeld via bug-lilypond
Am Freitag, den 21.02.2020, 11:33 + schrieb Simon Tatham: > Jonas Hahnfeld < > hah...@hahnjo.de > > wrote: > > looking at > > https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5779/ > > and > > the grammar you linked, I think the regular expression is also missing > > '+Aa,'. Does it make sense

Re: glyph-path-regexp in SVG output is overly strict

2020-02-21 Thread pkx166h
Jonas, On 21/02/2020 11:54, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: Am Freitag, den 21.02.2020, 11:50 + schrieb pkx166h: Jonas On 21/02/2020 11:33, Simon Tatham wrote: Jonas Hahnfeld < hah...@hahnjo.de wrote: looking at https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5779/ and the grammar you linked, I

Re: glyph-path-regexp in SVG output is overly strict

2020-02-21 Thread James Lowe
@bug On 20/02/2020 18:33, Simon Tatham wrote: A user of my notation font Gonville reported to me this week that they had tried to use the Lilypond SVG backend with Gonville, and had found that everything worked fine except that the sharp signs were mysteriously missing from the output. I debugg