On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 12:53 PM, luis jure wrote:
> in my opinion this is definitely a bug, and related to issue 638, which
> has been open for some time now:
OK, added as http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=898
Cheers,
Valentin
___
b
el 2009-10-29 a las 11:32 Valentin Villenave escribió:
> I'm not sure what to do. The first half of the measure does look ugly
> indeed (see attached), but I can't decide whether it's a bug or not.
in my opinion this is definitely a bug, and related to issue 638, which
has been open for some ti
Valentin Villenave wrote Thursday, October 29, 2009 10:32 AM
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 12:41 AM, luis jure
wrote:
Hi Luis, sorry for the delay,
% this shows the default beaming and how it should be beamed
r16 c8. c8 c r16 c8. c8[ c] |
I'm not sure what to do. The first half of the measur
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 12:41 AM, luis jure wrote:
>
>> I'm not top posting.
Hi Luis, sorry for the delay,
> % this shows the default beaming and how it should be beamed
> r16 c8. c8 c r16 c8. c8[ c] |
I'm not sure what to do. The first half of the measure does look ugly
indeed (see attached),
> I'm not top posting.
%{
when preceded by a 16th rest, a dotted eight is beamed
to the following eights.
this does not happen with a 16th note instead of a rest
}%
\version "2.13.5" % also in 2.13.4
\paper{ ragged-right=##t }
\relative c' {
% this shows the default beaming and how i
