Re: texttranslator field (either doc problem or bug)

2006-03-22 Thread Geoff Horton
> I personally don't bother so much about the names of the different > fields. If you want some text to appear at the place where the default > titling typesets the opus, for example, just use that field. I think the main reason I'm reluctant to go that route is the issue of documentation, particu

Re: texttranslator field (either doc problem or bug)

2006-03-22 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Quoting Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I'd like this header printed by default, but I realize there's currently no good spot for it. If it can't be printed, I think it needs to be pulled from the manual. Hmm... it shouldn't be too hard to add. Take a look at ly/titling-init.ly (especi

Re: texttranslator field (either doc problem or bug)

2006-03-22 Thread Graham Percival
On 22-Mar-06, at 10:43 AM, Geoff Horton wrote: Hmm... it shouldn't be too hard to add. Take a look at ly/titling-init.ly (especially since you were wanting to learn more about the next level of lilypond stuff. :) I found it already, based on your earlier suggestion :). It would be very eas

Re: texttranslator field (either doc problem or bug)

2006-03-22 Thread Graham Percival
On 22-Mar-06, at 7:28 AM, Geoff Horton wrote: I noticed a thread about this from January, but there doesn't seem to have been any discussion since then. Oops, it slipped through the cracks. The "All headers" template in 3.7.1 in the manual refers to a \texttranslator field, Hmm. It's in

texttranslator field (either doc problem or bug)

2006-03-22 Thread Geoff Horton
I noticed a thread about this from January, but there doesn't seem to have been any discussion since then. The "All headers" template in 3.7.1 in the manual refers to a \texttranslator field, but a close look at the sample output below it reveals that this field does not appear in the output. I