Arvid Grøtting wrote:
2007/2/28, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I can't reproduce this (even after uncommenting that line) with 2.11.20
on OSX. Could you check that you attached the right file?
I did. Are you sure you're not seeing a difference? I've attached
PNGs of the two different
2007/2/28, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I can't reproduce this (even after uncommenting that line) with 2.11.20
on OSX. Could you check that you attached the right file?
I did. Are you sure you're not seeing a difference? I've attached
PNGs of the two different results I get...
I k
I can't reproduce this (even after uncommenting that line) with 2.11.20
on OSX. Could you check that you attached the right file?
Cheers,
- Graham
Arvid Grøtting wrote:
Arvid Grøtting gmail.com> writes:
I haven't cooked up a minimal example yet, but is vertical stretching supposed
to disa
Arvid Grøtting gmail.com> writes:
> I haven't cooked up a minimal example yet, but is vertical stretching supposed
> to disappear if you set system-count to a value in the \paper block?
\version "2.11.20"
\paper {
%% uncomment next line, and stretching disappears.
%% system-count = 3
ragg
I haven't cooked up a minimal example yet, but is vertical stretching supposed
to disappear if you set system-count to a value in the \paper block?
--
Arvid
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bu
