Re: strange vertical position of slur and tuplet number

2010-10-25 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> It looks much better: the slur drops below the number. > > [...] Fixed in git. I'm hesitant to add a regression test for this; the example I've given is not simple enough and depends on the horizontal formatting. However, I wasn't able to find a shorter example which immediately exposes the

Re: strange vertical position of slur and tuplet number

2010-10-25 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> Yes, maybe $(Q#|(B does it fix the problem? > > It looks much better: the slur drops below the number. Yep! I've tried it just by myself. Fixed in git. Thanks for your help! Werner ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http:

Re: strange vertical position of slur and tuplet number

2010-10-25 Thread Neil Puttock
On 25 October 2010 22:13, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > Yes, maybe – does it fix the problem? It looks much better: the slur drops below the number. Cheers, Neil ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-l

Re: strange vertical position of slur and tuplet number

2010-10-25 Thread Werner LEMBERG
>> Yes, there is definitely a bug here.  A large penalty of "50" is >> added to some of the betting-looking slurs to avoid "extra >> encompass" objects, but I can't see what object these particular >> slurs are trying to avoid in this case; removing the forced >> accidental still yields the same p

Re: strange vertical position of slur and tuplet number

2010-10-25 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Neil Puttock wrote: > On 25 October 2010 21:37, Patrick McCarty wrote: > >> Yes, there is definitely a bug here.  A large penalty of "50" is added >> to some of the betting-looking slurs to avoid "extra encompass" >> objects, but I can't see what object these part

Re: strange vertical position of slur and tuplet number

2010-10-25 Thread Neil Puttock
On 25 October 2010 21:37, Patrick McCarty wrote: > Yes, there is definitely a bug here.  A large penalty of "50" is added > to some of the betting-looking slurs to avoid "extra encompass" > objects, but I can't see what object these particular slurs are trying > to avoid in this case; removing th

Re: strange vertical position of slur and tuplet number

2010-10-25 Thread Patrick McCarty
2010/10/25 Werner LEMBERG : > > look at this snippet: > >  \relative c' { >    e'2 e8 e e e | >    e2 g8 g g g >    \times 2/3 { \tupletUp b8( g!) b } >  } > > Can someone please explain why the slur is above the tuplet number? This is the slur that has the lowest score (penalty), out of 81 possib

strange vertical position of slur and tuplet number

2010-10-25 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Folks, look at this snippet: \relative c' { e'2 e8 e e e | e2 g8 g g g \times 2/3 { \tupletUp b8( g!) b } } Can someone please explain why the slur is above the tuplet number? It looks like a bug, since even slight modifications of the rhythm in the two bars before the triplet