Hello,
On 14/03/17 11:51, Thomas Morley wrote:
2017-03-14 12:18 GMT+01:00 Klaus Rettinghaus
:
Ok, here's another try:
(Version 2.19.56)
{
\override NoteHead.transparent = ##t
e'
\tweak Stem.length #3 e'
\tweak Stem.length #6 e'
}
The normal stem of an e' has the length of approximately 3 sta
2017-03-14 12:18 GMT+01:00 Klaus Rettinghaus
:
> Ok, here's another try:
> (Version 2.19.56)
>
> {
> \override NoteHead.transparent = ##t
> e'
> \tweak Stem.length #3 e'
> \tweak Stem.length #6 e'
> }
>
> The normal stem of an e' has the length of approximately 3 staff spaces. So
> I tweak the stem
Ok, here's another try:
(Version 2.19.56)
{
\override NoteHead.transparent = ##t
e'
\tweak Stem.length #3 e'
\tweak Stem.length #6 e'
}
The normal stem of an e' has the length of approximately 3 staff
spaces. So I tweak the stem length to 3 (staff spaces) to match the
previous. But it turns ou
Klaus,
Please keep the bug group in the cc.
On 13/03/17 07:52, Klaus Rettinghaus wrote:
Hi James,
thank you for your reply. But you are mistaken. version 2.19.x still
outputs it half-staff spaces.
It becomes clearer if you put an offset to the note heads with the
same value of Stem.length. I
Hello Klaus
On Sun, 19 Feb 2017 20:26:50 +0100
Klaus Rettinghaus wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Internals Reference says stem.length measures in staff spaces. But
> actually it goes by half staff spaces. So either the documentation is
> wrong or this is a bug.
>
> \version "2.18.2"
>
> \relative {
>
Hi all,
Internals Reference says stem.length measures in staff spaces. But actually it
goes by half staff spaces.
So either the documentation is wrong or this is a bug.
\version "2.18.2"
\relative {
\override Stem.length = 0 g'
\override Stem.length = 2 g
\override Stem.length = 4 g
