consistent method for labeling repeats without having to worry
about which line they are going to end up on.
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Federico Bruni wrote:
> 2014-05-01 20:27 GMT+02:00 David Morawski :
>
>> > I'm not top posting.
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>&
2014-05-01 21:13 GMT+02:00 david morawski :
> Thank you, Federico. Changing your code to
>
> \once \override Score.RehearsalMark #'break-visibility =
> #end-of-line-visible
> \once \override Score.RehearsalMark #'self-alignment-X = #RIGHT
>
> worked for me. Is this considered a bes
2014-05-01 20:27 GMT+02:00 David Morawski :
> > I'm not top posting.
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm having trouble putting text above repeat signs, specifically when the
> :|
> symbol precedes a linebreak. In the following example, the text ("3x") that
> shou
> I'm not top posting.
Hello,
I'm having trouble putting text above repeat signs, specifically when the :|
symbol precedes a linebreak. In the following example, the text ("3x") that
should belong to the first :| gets pushed on top of the |: of the next volta
repeat.
\
thanks Pavel, added with label defect:
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3421
2013/6/23 Pavel Roskin
> Percent signs in ghostscript output files (i.e. those after -sOutputFile)
> should be duplicated on the command line. It's not a format string bug as
&g
Percent signs in ghostscript output files (i.e. those after
-sOutputFile) should be duplicated on the command line. It's not a
format string bug as I initially suspected, it's a documented feature.
http://ghostscript.com/doc/8.63/Use.htm#File_output
"Note: Since the % chara
Comment #3 on issue 2139 by elu...@gmail.com: Doc AU: command line options
- where to use equal signs in short and long term definitions
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2139
I'm confused - I've never used -d= before, I always used -d…
but in fact
-dgui works
Comment #2 on issue 2139 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Doc AU: command line options
- where to use equal signs in short and long term definitions
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2139
Before I dive in to this, I think we need some consensus.
At the moment we have (for example)
-d
Hello,
On 27 December 2011 11:55, -Eluze wrote:
>
>
> lilypond-4 wrote:
>>
>> Updates:
>> Status: Started
>> Owner: pkx1...@gmail.com
>>
>> Comment #1 on issue 2139 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Doc AU: command line
>> options
>> - wh
lilypond-4 wrote:
>
> Updates:
> Status: Started
> Owner: pkx1...@gmail.com
>
> Comment #1 on issue 2139 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Doc AU: command line
> options
> - where to use equal signs in short and long term definitions
> http://code.google.com/p/lil
Updates:
Status: Started
Owner: pkx1...@gmail.com
Comment #1 on issue 2139 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Doc AU: command line options
- where to use equal signs in short and long term definitions
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2139
I'd like to wait until
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Documentation
New issue 2139 by elu...@gmail.com: Doc AU: command line options - where to
use equal signs in short and long term definitions
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2139
when reading the line
-d,--define-default=var=val
Am Donnerstag, 9. Juni 2011, 13:22:06 schrieb Nils:
> I need correct baroque figured bass signs not the modern equivalents which
> Lilypond provides.
Yes, that's a valid feature request in my eyes (actually, I'll need them too
for my own editions).
> For example the slashed 6
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Low
New issue 1178 by Carl.D.Sorensen: Measure_grouping_engraver uses
non-standard signs
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1178
As currently implemented, the measure_grouping_engraver uses a triangle for
groups
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 5:47 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> On 6/16/10 1:58 AM, "flup2" wrote:
>>
>> I would like to know if somebody knows how conductng signs (
>> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=259
>> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=259 ) are created
Copying to -devel to get developer feedback, and to bug to get the issue in
the tracker if it belongs there.
On 6/16/10 1:58 AM, "flup2" wrote:
>
> I would like to know if somebody knows how conductng signs (
> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=259
> http://lsr.dsi.un
> > > Could you tell me what the exact meanings of these barlines are?
> > > The NR hasn't a literal description:
> >
> > Indeed. So here it is.
>
> These are shown in 1.2.5 Bar lines -- but of course they're only
> shown in the picture example. Again, all of the documentation is
> written with t
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 09:57:52 +0100 (CET)
Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Could you tell me what the exact meanings of these barlines are?
> > The NR hasn't a literal description:
>
> Indeed. So here it is.
These are shown in 1.2.5 Bar lines -- but of course they're only
shown in t
> :|two repeat dots followed by a thick line
Oops! This should be
:|two repeat dots, a thin line, and a thick line
Werner
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
[I've forwarded your mail to the bug-lilypond list.]
> Could you tell me what the exact meanings of these barlines are?
> The NR hasn't a literal description:
Indeed. So here it is.
> \bar ".|" \bar ".|." \bar "|." \bar ":|:"
> (What kind of repetition barline is it?)
| a thin line
||
On Tuesday 11 January 2005 20.02, Erik Ronström wrote:
> According to the regression tests, LilyPond does not typeset beams
> across manual repeat signs. That is true. However, it does place beams
> across repeat-voltas, if the repeat sign is mid-bar. Is there a way to
> avoid that w
Seems like a bug to me!
Example:
\version "2.4.2"
\relative c' {
\repeat volta 2 {c d e16 f } e f g4 |
}
/Mats
Erik Ronström wrote:
According to the regression tests, LilyPond does not typeset beams
across manual repeat signs. That is true. However, it does place beams
across re
22 matches
Mail list logo
